solar-mini vs Pixtral 12B vs Llama-3.2-3B
Pixtral 12B comes out ahead, 64 to 52 and 49 on our weighted score.
Upstage
solar-mini
52/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.15
- Context33K
- Our pick
Mistral AIPixtral 12B
64/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.15
- Context128K
MetaLlama-3.2-3B
49/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.335
- Context131K
Pixtral 12B is our pick
Pixtral 12B is the better all-round choice, scoring 64/100 against solar-mini (52) and Llama-3.2-3B (49). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest pricesolar-mini and Pixtral 12Bsolar-mini $0.15 · Pixtral 12B $0.15 · Llama-3.2-3B $0.159 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextLlama-3.2-3BLlama-3.2-3B 131,072 · Pixtral 12B 128,000 · solar-mini 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsPixtral 12Bsolar-mini: Text · Pixtral 12B: Text, Images · Llama-3.2-3B: Text
- Self-hostingPixtral 12B and Llama-3.2-3BPublishes downloadable weights (Llama 3.2 Community License)
| Measure | Weight | solar-mini | Pixtral 12B | Llama-3.2-3B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 89 | 89 | 88 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 50 | 0 |
| Context window | 20% | 0 | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 52/100 | 64/100 | 49/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | solar-miniUpstage | Pixtral 12BMistral AI | Llama-3.2-3BMeta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.15 | $0.15 | $0.10 (best) |
| Output | $0.15 (best) | $0.15 (best) | $0.335 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.15 (best) | $0.15 (best) | $0.159 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Upstage API | Official Mistral API | Median of 3 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 32,768 tokens | 128,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 4,096 tokens | 128,000 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | No |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | OpenLlama 3.2 Community License |
| API model ID | solar-mini | pixtral-12b | — |
| API providers | 1 | 4 (best) | 3 |
| Released | Jun 12, 2024 | Sep 1, 2024 | Sep 25, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Sep 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2023 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- solar-mini$1.80
- Pixtral 12B$1.80
- Llama-3.2-3B$1.67
Which should you choose?
Which is better: solar-mini, Pixtral 12B or Llama-3.2-3B?
Pixtral 12B is the better all-round choice, scoring 64/100 against solar-mini (52) and Llama-3.2-3B (49). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, solar-mini, Pixtral 12B or Llama-3.2-3B?
solar-mini is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). Pixtral 12B costs $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price); Llama-3.2-3B costs $0.10 input / $0.335 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for solar-mini versus $0.15 for Pixtral 12B (1× as much) and $0.159 for Llama-3.2-3B (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. solar-mini has not been scored yet, Pixtral 12B has not been scored yet and Llama-3.2-3B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for solar-mini, Pixtral 12B and Llama-3.2-3B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Llama-3.2-3B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Llama-3.2-3B has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Pixtral 12B and 32,768 for solar-mini. Maximum output per response: solar-mini up to 4,096, Pixtral 12B up to 128,000, Llama-3.2-3B up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
solar-mini accepts text; Pixtral 12B accepts text and images; Llama-3.2-3B accepts text. Pixtral 12B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Pixtral 12B and Llama-3.2-3B publishes its weights (Llama 3.2 Community License) and can be self-hosted; solar-mini is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Llama-3.2-3B is the newest, released Sep 25, 2024. Pixtral 12B came out Sep 1, 2024; solar-mini came out Jun 12, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: solar-mini Sep 2024, Pixtral 12B Sep 2024, Llama-3.2-3B Dec 2023.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
