ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Seed 2.0 Lite vs Mistral Large 3

Seed 2.0 Lite comes out ahead, 73 to 50 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    ByteDance Seed

    Seed 2.0 Lite

    Released Feb 14, 2026

    73/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.089 / $0.534
    • Context256K
  2. Mistral AI

    Mistral Large 3

    Released Dec 2, 2025

    50/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.50 / $1.50
    • Context262K
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Seed 2.0 Lite is our pick

Seed 2.0 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Mistral Large 3 (50). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceSeed 2.0 LiteSeed 2.0 Lite $0.20 · Mistral Large 3 $0.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMistral Large 3Mistral Large 3 262,144 · Seed 2.0 Lite 256,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSeed 2.0 LiteSeed 2.0 Lite: Text, Images, Video · Mistral Large 3: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingMistral Large 3Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightSeed 2.0 LiteMistral Large 3
Price50%8356
Inputs & features30%8050
Context window20%3637
Overall100%73/10050/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Seed 2.0 Lite vs Mistral Large 3 specifications side by side
SpecificationSeed 2.0 LiteByteDance SeedMistral Large 3Mistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.089 (best)$0.50
Output$0.534 (best)$1.50
Cached input$0.018 (best)$0.05
Blended (3:1)$0.20 (best)$0.75
Long-context rateOver 32K: $0.134 / $0.802Same rate
Price sourceOfficial Volcengine Ark APIOfficial Mistral API
Limits
Context window256,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Max output32,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoYesNo
ReasoningYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · maxNo
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpen
API model IDdoubao-seed-2-0-lite-260428mistral-large-2512
API providers613 (best)
ReleasedFeb 14, 2026Dec 2, 2025
Knowledge cutoff—Nov 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Seed 2.0 Lite$1.96
  • Mistral Large 3$8.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Seed 2.0 Lite or Mistral Large 3?

Seed 2.0 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Mistral Large 3 (50). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Lite or Mistral Large 3?

Seed 2.0 Lite is cheaper at $0.089 input / $0.534 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). Mistral Large 3 costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.20 per million tokens for Seed 2.0 Lite versus $0.75 for Mistral Large 3 (3.7× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Seed 2.0 Lite has not been scored yet and Mistral Large 3 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Seed 2.0 Lite and Mistral Large 3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Large 3 has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for Seed 2.0 Lite. Maximum output per response: Seed 2.0 Lite up to 32,000, Mistral Large 3 up to 262,144 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Seed 2.0 Lite accepts text, images and video; Mistral Large 3 accepts text and images. Seed 2.0 Lite handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Mistral Large 3 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.0 Lite is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Seed 2.0 Lite is the newest, released Feb 14, 2026. Mistral Large 3 came out Dec 2, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Large 3 Nov 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.