ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Seed 2.0 Lite vs Ministral 3 3B

Too close to call on our weighted score (Ministral 3 3B 74, Seed 2.0 Lite 73). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. ByteDance Seed

    Seed 2.0 Lite

    Released Feb 14, 2026

    73/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.089 / $0.534
    • Context256K
  2. Mistral AI

    Ministral 3 3B

    Released Dec 2, 2025

    74/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.10
    • Context262K
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Ministral 3 3B 74/100, Seed 2.0 Lite 73/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Ministral 3 3B on price and Ministral 3 3B for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceMinistral 3 3BMinistral 3 3B $0.10 · Seed 2.0 Lite $0.20 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMinistral 3 3BMinistral 3 3B 262,144 · Seed 2.0 Lite 256,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSeed 2.0 LiteSeed 2.0 Lite: Text, Images, Video · Ministral 3 3B: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingMinistral 3 3BPublishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightSeed 2.0 LiteMinistral 3 3B
Price50%8397
Inputs & features30%8060
Context window20%3637
Overall100%73/10074/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Seed 2.0 Lite vs Ministral 3 3B specifications side by side
SpecificationSeed 2.0 LiteByteDance SeedMinistral 3 3BMistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.089 (best)$0.10
Output$0.534$0.10 (best)
Cached input$0.018—
Blended (3:1)$0.20$0.10 (best)
Long-context rateOver 32K: $0.134 / $0.802Same rate
Price sourceOfficial Volcengine Ark APIMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window256,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Max output32,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoYesNo
ReasoningYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · maxNo
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenApache 2.0
API model IDdoubao-seed-2-0-lite-260428—
API providers6 (best)1
ReleasedFeb 14, 2026Dec 2, 2025
Knowledge cutoff——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Seed 2.0 Lite$1.96
  • Ministral 3 3B$1.20
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Seed 2.0 Lite or Ministral 3 3B?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Ministral 3 3B 74/100, Seed 2.0 Lite 73/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Ministral 3 3B on price and Ministral 3 3B for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Lite or Ministral 3 3B?

Ministral 3 3B is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.10 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Seed 2.0 Lite costs $0.089 input / $0.534 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.10 per million tokens for Ministral 3 3B versus $0.20 for Seed 2.0 Lite (2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Seed 2.0 Lite has not been scored yet and Ministral 3 3B has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Seed 2.0 Lite and Ministral 3 3B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Ministral 3 3B has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for Seed 2.0 Lite. Maximum output per response: Seed 2.0 Lite up to 32,000, Ministral 3 3B up to 262,144 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Seed 2.0 Lite accepts text, images and video; Ministral 3 3B accepts text and images. Seed 2.0 Lite handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Ministral 3 3B publishes its weights (Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.0 Lite is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Seed 2.0 Lite is the newest, released Feb 14, 2026. Ministral 3 3B came out Dec 2, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.