Sarvam 30B vs Seed 2.0 Lite
Seed 2.0 Lite comes out ahead, 73 to 65 on our weighted score, though Sarvam 30B is 5× cheaper per token.
Sarvam AI
Sarvam 30B
65/100- ECI—
- Price$0.02 / $0.10
- Context128K
- Our pick
ByteDance SeedSeed 2.0 Lite
73/100- ECI—
- Price$0.089 / $0.534
- Context256K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Seed 2.0 Lite is our pick
Seed 2.0 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Sarvam 30B (65). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Sarvam 30B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSarvam 30BSarvam 30B $0.04 · Seed 2.0 Lite $0.20 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextSeed 2.0 LiteSeed 2.0 Lite 256,000 · Sarvam 30B 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSeed 2.0 LiteSarvam 30B: Text · Seed 2.0 Lite: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingSarvam 30BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Sarvam 30B | Seed 2.0 Lite |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 100 | 83 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 65/100 | 73/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Sarvam 30BSarvam AI | Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.02 (best) | $0.089 |
| Output | $0.10 (best) | $0.534 |
| Cached input | — | $0.018 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.04 (best) | $0.20 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 32K: $0.134 / $0.802 |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Official Volcengine Ark API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 256,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens (best) | 32,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes · low · medium · high | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | sarvam-30b | doubao-seed-2-0-lite-260428 |
| API providers | 2 | 6 (best) |
| Released | Feb 18, 2026 | Feb 14, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Sarvam 30B$0.40
- Seed 2.0 Lite$1.96
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Sarvam 30B or Seed 2.0 Lite?
Seed 2.0 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Sarvam 30B (65). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Sarvam 30B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Sarvam 30B or Seed 2.0 Lite?
Sarvam 30B is cheaper at $0.02 input / $0.10 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Seed 2.0 Lite costs $0.089 input / $0.534 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.04 per million tokens for Sarvam 30B versus $0.20 for Seed 2.0 Lite (5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Sarvam 30B has not been scored yet and Seed 2.0 Lite has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Sarvam 30B and Seed 2.0 Lite yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Seed 2.0 Lite has the largest context window at 256,000 tokens, against 128,000 for Sarvam 30B. Maximum output per response: Sarvam 30B up to 128,000, Seed 2.0 Lite up to 32,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Sarvam 30B accepts text; Seed 2.0 Lite accepts text, images and video. Seed 2.0 Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Sarvam 30B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.0 Lite is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Sarvam 30B is the newest, released Feb 18, 2026. Seed 2.0 Lite came out Feb 14, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
