Sarvam 105B vs Tiny Aya Earth vs Trendyol Asure 12B
Sarvam 105B comes out ahead, 31 to 25 and 15 on our weighted score, though Trendyol Asure 12B is 28% cheaper per token.
- Our pick
Sarvam AI
Sarvam 105B
31/100- ECI—
- Price$0.158 / $0.632
- Context131K
CohereTiny Aya Earth
15/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context8K
Trendyol
Trendyol Asure 12B
25/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.50
- Context131K
Sarvam 105B is our pick
Sarvam 105B is the better all-round choice, scoring 31/100 against Trendyol Asure 12B (25) and Tiny Aya Earth (15). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceTrendyol Asure 12BTrendyol Asure 12B $0.20 · Sarvam 105B $0.276 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Tiny Aya Earth unpriced
- Longest contextSarvam 105B and Trendyol Asure 12BSarvam 105B 131,072 · Trendyol Asure 12B 131,072 · Tiny Aya Earth 8,000 tokens
- Widest inputsTrendyol Asure 12BSarvam 105B: Text · Tiny Aya Earth: Text · Trendyol Asure 12B: Text, Images
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Sarvam 105B | Tiny Aya Earth | Trendyol Asure 12B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 35 | 25 | 25 |
| Context window | 40% | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| Overall | 100% | 31/100 | 15/100 | 25/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Sarvam 105BSarvam AI | Tiny Aya EarthCohere | Trendyol Asure 12BTrendyol |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.158 | — | $0.10 (best) |
| Output | $0.632 | — | $0.50 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.053 | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.276 | — | $0.20 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | — | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Sarvam AI API | — | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens (best) | 8,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 8,000 tokens | — |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | No |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | OpenCC-BY-NC-4.0 | OpenGemma |
| API model ID | sarvam-105b | tiny-aya-earth | — |
| API providers | 3 (best) | 1 | 1 |
| Released | Feb 18, 2026 | Feb 17, 2026 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Sarvam 105B$2.84
- Tiny Aya Earth—
- Trendyol Asure 12B$2.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Sarvam 105B, Tiny Aya Earth or Trendyol Asure 12B?
Sarvam 105B is the better all-round choice, scoring 31/100 against Trendyol Asure 12B (25) and Tiny Aya Earth (15). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Sarvam 105B, Tiny Aya Earth or Trendyol Asure 12B?
Trendyol Asure 12B is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Sarvam 105B costs $0.158 input / $0.632 output per million tokens (official Sarvam AI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.20 per million tokens for Trendyol Asure 12B versus $0.276 for Sarvam 105B (1.4× as much). Tiny Aya Earth has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Sarvam 105B has not been scored yet, Tiny Aya Earth has not been scored yet and Trendyol Asure 12B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Sarvam 105B, Tiny Aya Earth and Trendyol Asure 12B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Trendyol Asure 12B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Sarvam 105B and Trendyol Asure 12B have the largest context windows (131,072 and 131,072 tokens), against 8,000 for Tiny Aya Earth. Maximum output per response: Sarvam 105B up to 131,072, Tiny Aya Earth up to 8,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Sarvam 105B accepts text; Tiny Aya Earth accepts text; Trendyol Asure 12B accepts text and images. Trendyol Asure 12B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0 and Gemma), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Trendyol Asure 12B is the newest, released Feb 19, 2026. Sarvam 105B came out Feb 18, 2026; Tiny Aya Earth came out Feb 17, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
