Sarvam 105B vs Seed 2.0 Lite vs Trendyol Asure 12B
Seed 2.0 Lite comes out ahead, 73 to 65 and 54 on our weighted score, though Sarvam 105B is 2.4× cheaper per token.
Sarvam AI
Sarvam 105B
65/100- ECI—
- Price$0.047 / $0.186
- Context131K
- Our pick
ByteDance SeedSeed 2.0 Lite
73/100- ECI—
- Price$0.089 / $0.534
- Context256K
Trendyol
Trendyol Asure 12B
54/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.50
- Context131K
Seed 2.0 Lite is our pick
Seed 2.0 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Sarvam 105B (65) and Trendyol Asure 12B (54). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Sarvam 105B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSarvam 105BSarvam 105B $0.082 · Trendyol Asure 12B $0.20 · Seed 2.0 Lite $0.20 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextSeed 2.0 LiteSeed 2.0 Lite 256,000 · Sarvam 105B 131,072 · Trendyol Asure 12B 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsSeed 2.0 LiteSarvam 105B: Text · Seed 2.0 Lite: Text, Images, Video · Trendyol Asure 12B: Text, Images
- Self-hostingSarvam 105B and Trendyol Asure 12BPublishes downloadable weights (Gemma)
| Measure | Weight | Sarvam 105B | Seed 2.0 Lite | Trendyol Asure 12B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 100 | 83 | 83 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 80 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 36 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 65/100 | 73/100 | 54/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Sarvam 105BSarvam AI | Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | Trendyol Asure 12BTrendyol |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.047 (best) | $0.089 | $0.10 |
| Output | $0.186 (best) | $0.534 | $0.50 |
| Cached input | — | $0.018 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.082 (best) | $0.20 | $0.20 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 32K: $0.134 / $0.802 | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 2 providers | Official Volcengine Ark API | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 256,000 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 32,000 tokens | — |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes · low · medium · high | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | No |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | OpenGemma |
| API model ID | sarvam-105b | doubao-seed-2-0-lite-260428 | — |
| API providers | 3 | 6 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Sep 1, 2025 | Feb 14, 2026 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Sarvam 105B$0.842
- Seed 2.0 Lite$1.96
- Trendyol Asure 12B$2.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Sarvam 105B, Seed 2.0 Lite or Trendyol Asure 12B?
Seed 2.0 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Sarvam 105B (65) and Trendyol Asure 12B (54). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Sarvam 105B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Sarvam 105B, Seed 2.0 Lite or Trendyol Asure 12B?
Sarvam 105B is cheaper at $0.047 input / $0.186 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Trendyol Asure 12B costs $0.10 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); Seed 2.0 Lite costs $0.089 input / $0.534 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.082 per million tokens for Sarvam 105B versus $0.20 for Trendyol Asure 12B (2.4× as much) and $0.20 for Seed 2.0 Lite (2.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Sarvam 105B has not been scored yet, Seed 2.0 Lite has not been scored yet and Trendyol Asure 12B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Sarvam 105B, Seed 2.0 Lite and Trendyol Asure 12B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Trendyol Asure 12B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Seed 2.0 Lite has the largest context window at 256,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Sarvam 105B and 131,072 for Trendyol Asure 12B. Maximum output per response: Sarvam 105B up to 131,072, Seed 2.0 Lite up to 32,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Sarvam 105B accepts text; Seed 2.0 Lite accepts text, images and video; Trendyol Asure 12B accepts text and images. Seed 2.0 Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Sarvam 105B and Trendyol Asure 12B publishes its weights (Gemma) and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.0 Lite is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Trendyol Asure 12B is the newest, released Feb 19, 2026. Seed 2.0 Lite came out Feb 14, 2026; Sarvam 105B came out Sep 1, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
