Sarvam 105B vs Jamba Mini
Jamba Mini comes out ahead, 55 to 52 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Sarvam AI
Sarvam 105B
52/100- ECI—
- Price$0.158 / $0.632
- Context131K
- Our pick
AI21 LabsJamba Mini
55/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $0.40
- Context256K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Jamba Mini is our pick
Jamba Mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 55/100 against Sarvam 105B (52). It leads on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceJamba MiniJamba Mini $0.25 · Sarvam 105B $0.276 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextJamba MiniJamba Mini 256,000 · Sarvam 105B 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsSarvam 105B: Text · Jamba Mini: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Sarvam 105B | Jamba Mini |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 73 | 75 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 25 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 52/100 | 55/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Sarvam 105BSarvam AI | Jamba MiniAI21 Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.158 (best) | $0.20 |
| Output | $0.632 | $0.40 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.053 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.276 | $0.25 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Sarvam AI API | Official AI21 Labs API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 256,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 4,096 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Open |
| API model ID | sarvam-105b | jamba-mini |
| API providers | 3 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Feb 18, 2026 | Jan 8, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Aug 22, 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Sarvam 105B$2.84
- Jamba Mini$2.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Sarvam 105B or Jamba Mini?
Jamba Mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 55/100 against Sarvam 105B (52). It leads on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Sarvam 105B or Jamba Mini?
Jamba Mini is cheaper at $0.20 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official AI21 Labs API price). Sarvam 105B costs $0.158 input / $0.632 output per million tokens (official Sarvam AI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.25 per million tokens for Jamba Mini versus $0.276 for Sarvam 105B (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Sarvam 105B has not been scored yet and Jamba Mini has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Sarvam 105B and Jamba Mini yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Jamba Mini has the largest context window at 256,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Sarvam 105B. Maximum output per response: Sarvam 105B up to 131,072, Jamba Mini up to 4,096 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Sarvam 105B accepts text; Jamba Mini accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Sarvam 105B is the newest, released Feb 18, 2026. Jamba Mini came out Jan 8, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Jamba Mini Aug 22, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
