ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Rnj-1 Instruct vs Qwen3 30B A3B vs Ministral 3 8B

Ministral 3 8B comes out ahead, 68 to 55 and 50 on our weighted score.

  1. Essential AI

    Rnj-1 Instruct

    Released Dec 4, 2025

    50/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.15
    • Context33K
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3 30B A3B

    Released Apr 28, 2025

    55/100
    • ECI136.2
    • Price$0.108 / $0.475
    • Context131K
  3. Our pick

    Mistral AI

    Ministral 3 8B

    Released Dec 2, 2025

    68/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.15
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Ministral 3 8B is our pick

Ministral 3 8B is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against Qwen3 30B A3B (55) and Rnj-1 Instruct (50). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceRnj-1 Instruct and Ministral 3 8BRnj-1 Instruct $0.15 · Ministral 3 8B $0.15 · Qwen3 30B A3B $0.20 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMinistral 3 8BMinistral 3 8B 262,144 · Qwen3 30B A3B 131,072 · Rnj-1 Instruct 32,768 tokens
  • Widest inputsMinistral 3 8BRnj-1 Instruct: Text · Qwen3 30B A3B: Text · Ministral 3 8B: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightRnj-1 InstructQwen3 30B A3BMinistral 3 8B
Price50%858085
Inputs & features30%253560
Context window20%02537
Overall100%50/10055/10068/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Rnj-1 Instruct vs Qwen3 30B A3B vs Ministral 3 8B specifications side by side
SpecificationRnj-1 InstructEssential AIQwen3 30B A3BAlibaba (Qwen)Ministral 3 8BMistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)—136.2—
ECI rank—#126 of 165—
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—61.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—62.8%—
Price per million tokens
Input$0.15$0.108 (best)$0.15
Output$0.15 (best)$0.475$0.15 (best)
Cached input——$0.015
Blended (3:1)$0.15 (best)$0.20$0.15 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersMedian of 14 providersOfficial Mistral API
Limits
Context window32,768 tokens131,072 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Max output32,768 tokens16,384 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoYesNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenApache 2.0OpenOpenApache 2.0
API model ID——ministral-8b-2512
API providers114 (best)11
ReleasedDec 4, 2025Apr 28, 2025Dec 2, 2025
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Rnj-1 Instruct$1.80
  • Qwen3 30B A3B$2.03
  • Ministral 3 8B$1.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Rnj-1 Instruct, Qwen3 30B A3B or Ministral 3 8B?

Ministral 3 8B is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against Qwen3 30B A3B (55) and Rnj-1 Instruct (50). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Rnj-1 Instruct, Qwen3 30B A3B or Ministral 3 8B?

Rnj-1 Instruct is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Ministral 3 8B costs $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price); Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.108 input / $0.475 output per million tokens (median across 14 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Rnj-1 Instruct versus $0.15 for Ministral 3 8B (1× as much) and $0.20 for Qwen3 30B A3B (1.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Rnj-1 Instruct has not been scored yet, Qwen3 30B A3B has an ECI of 136.2 and Ministral 3 8B has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Rnj-1 Instruct, Qwen3 30B A3B and Ministral 3 8B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Ministral 3 8B has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen3 30B A3B and 32,768 for Rnj-1 Instruct. Maximum output per response: Rnj-1 Instruct up to 32,768, Qwen3 30B A3B up to 16,384, Ministral 3 8B up to 262,144 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Rnj-1 Instruct accepts text; Qwen3 30B A3B accepts text; Ministral 3 8B accepts text and images. Ministral 3 8B handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Rnj-1 Instruct is the newest, released Dec 4, 2025. Ministral 3 8B came out Dec 2, 2025; Qwen3 30B A3B came out Apr 28, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.