ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Rnj-1 Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Flash vs Ministral 3 8B

Ministral 3 8B comes out ahead, 68 to 60 and 50 on our weighted score.

  1. Essential AI

    Rnj-1 Instruct

    Released Dec 4, 2025

    50/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.15
    • Context33K
  2. Xiaomi

    MiMo-V2-Flash

    Released Dec 16, 2025

    60/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.30
    • Context262K
  3. Our pick

    Mistral AI

    Ministral 3 8B

    Released Dec 2, 2025

    68/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.15
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Ministral 3 8B is our pick

Ministral 3 8B is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against MiMo-V2-Flash (60) and Rnj-1 Instruct (50). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceSame priceRnj-1 Instruct $0.15 · MiMo-V2-Flash $0.15 · Ministral 3 8B $0.15 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMiMo-V2-Flash and Ministral 3 8BMiMo-V2-Flash 262,144 · Ministral 3 8B 262,144 · Rnj-1 Instruct 32,768 tokens
  • Widest inputsMinistral 3 8BRnj-1 Instruct: Text · MiMo-V2-Flash: Text · Ministral 3 8B: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightRnj-1 InstructMiMo-V2-FlashMinistral 3 8B
Price50%858585
Inputs & features30%253560
Context window20%03737
Overall100%50/10060/10068/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Rnj-1 Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Flash vs Ministral 3 8B specifications side by side
SpecificationRnj-1 InstructEssential AIMiMo-V2-FlashXiaomiMinistral 3 8BMistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.15$0.10 (best)$0.15
Output$0.15 (best)$0.30$0.15 (best)
Cached input——$0.015
Blended (3:1)$0.15$0.15$0.15
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersMedian of 3 providersOfficial Mistral API
Limits
Context window32,768 tokens262,144 tokens (best)262,144 tokens (best)
Max output32,768 tokens65,536 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoYesNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenApache 2.0OpenOpenApache 2.0
API model ID——ministral-8b-2512
API providers1411 (best)
ReleasedDec 4, 2025Dec 16, 2025Dec 2, 2025
Knowledge cutoff—Dec 1, 2024—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Rnj-1 Instruct$1.80
  • MiMo-V2-Flash$1.60
  • Ministral 3 8B$1.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Rnj-1 Instruct, MiMo-V2-Flash or Ministral 3 8B?

Ministral 3 8B is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against MiMo-V2-Flash (60) and Rnj-1 Instruct (50). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Rnj-1 Instruct, MiMo-V2-Flash or Ministral 3 8B?

Rnj-1 Instruct, MiMo-V2-Flash and Ministral 3 8B cost the same: $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Rnj-1 Instruct has not been scored yet, MiMo-V2-Flash has not been scored yet and Ministral 3 8B has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Rnj-1 Instruct, MiMo-V2-Flash and Ministral 3 8B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Flash and Ministral 3 8B have the largest context windows (262,144 and 262,144 tokens), against 32,768 for Rnj-1 Instruct. Maximum output per response: Rnj-1 Instruct up to 32,768, MiMo-V2-Flash up to 65,536, Ministral 3 8B up to 262,144 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Rnj-1 Instruct accepts text; MiMo-V2-Flash accepts text; Ministral 3 8B accepts text and images. Ministral 3 8B handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the newest, released Dec 16, 2025. Rnj-1 Instruct came out Dec 4, 2025; Ministral 3 8B came out Dec 2, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: MiMo-V2-Flash Dec 1, 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.