Relace Search vs Apertus 70B vs MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro comes out ahead, 42 to 35 and 32 on our weighted score, though Apertus 70B is 19% cheaper per token.
Relace
Relace Search
35/100- ECI—
- Price$1.00 / $3.00
- Context256K
Swiss AI
Apertus 70B
32/100- ECI—
- Price$0.82 / $2.42
- Context66K
- Our pick
XiaomiMiMo-V2-Pro
42/100- ECI—
- Price$1.00 / $3.00
- Context1.05M
MiMo-V2-Pro is our pick
MiMo-V2-Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 42/100 against Relace Search (35) and Apertus 70B (32). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Apertus 70B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceApertus 70BApertus 70B $1.22 · Relace Search $1.50 · MiMo-V2-Pro $1.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiMo-V2-ProMiMo-V2-Pro 1,048,576 · Relace Search 256,000 · Apertus 70B 65,536 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsRelace Search: Text · Apertus 70B: Text · MiMo-V2-Pro: Text
- Self-hostingApertus 70BPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Relace Search | Apertus 70B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 40 | 44 | 40 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 25 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 36 | 12 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 35/100 | 32/100 | 42/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Relace SearchRelace | Apertus 70BSwiss AI | MiMo-V2-ProXiaomi |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $1.00 | $0.82 (best) | $1.00 |
| Output | $3.00 | $2.42 (best) | $3.00 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.50 | $1.22 (best) | $1.50 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 3 providers | Median of 3 providers | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 256,000 tokens | 65,536 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | 8,192 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenApache-2.0 | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | — | — |
| API providers | 3 (best) | 3 (best) | 2 |
| Released | Dec 8, 2025 | Sep 2, 2025 | Mar 18, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Sep 2025 | Dec 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Relace Search$16.00
- Apertus 70B$13.04
- MiMo-V2-Pro$16.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Relace Search, Apertus 70B or MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 42/100 against Relace Search (35) and Apertus 70B (32). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Apertus 70B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Relace Search, Apertus 70B or MiMo-V2-Pro?
Apertus 70B is cheaper at $0.82 input / $2.42 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Relace Search costs $1.00 input / $3.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers); MiMo-V2-Pro costs $1.00 input / $3.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.22 per million tokens for Apertus 70B versus $1.50 for Relace Search (1.2× as much) and $1.50 for MiMo-V2-Pro (1.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Relace Search has not been scored yet, Apertus 70B has not been scored yet and MiMo-V2-Pro has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Relace Search, Apertus 70B and MiMo-V2-Pro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Pro has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 256,000 for Relace Search and 65,536 for Apertus 70B. Maximum output per response: Relace Search up to 128,000, Apertus 70B up to 8,192, MiMo-V2-Pro up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Relace Search accepts text; Apertus 70B accepts text; MiMo-V2-Pro accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Apertus 70B publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Relace Search and MiMo-V2-Pro is proprietary.
Which is newer?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the newest, released Mar 18, 2026. Relace Search came out Dec 8, 2025; Apertus 70B came out Sep 2, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Apertus 70B Sep 2025, MiMo-V2-Pro Dec 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
