ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Reka Flash 3 vs ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B vs Phi-4-mini

Too close to call on our weighted score (ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B 57, Phi-4-mini 56, Reka Flash 3 50). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Reka AI

    Reka Flash 3

    Released Mar 10, 2025

    50/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.20
    • Context66K
  2. Baidu

    ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B

    Released Jun 30, 2025

    57/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.07 / $0.28
    • Context131K
  3. Microsoft

    Phi-4-mini

    Released Feb 26, 2025

    56/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.075 / $0.30
    • Context128K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B 57/100, Phi-4-mini 56/100, Reka Flash 3 50/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B on price and ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceERNIE 4.5 21B A3BERNIE 4.5 21B A3B $0.122 · Reka Flash 3 $0.125 · Phi-4-mini $0.131 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextERNIE 4.5 21B A3BERNIE 4.5 21B A3B 131,072 · Phi-4-mini 128,000 · Reka Flash 3 65,536 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsReka Flash 3: Text · ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B: Text · Phi-4-mini: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightReka Flash 3ERNIE 4.5 21B A3BPhi-4-mini
Price50%898988
Inputs & features30%102525
Context window20%122524
Overall100%50/10057/10056/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Reka Flash 3 vs ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B vs Phi-4-mini specifications side by side
SpecificationReka Flash 3Reka AIERNIE 4.5 21B A3BBaiduPhi-4-miniMicrosoft
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.10$0.07 (best)$0.075
Output$0.20 (best)$0.28$0.30
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.125$0.122 (best)$0.131
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 3 providersMedian of 1 providersOfficial Azure API
Limits
Context window65,536 tokens131,072 tokens (best)128,000 tokens
Max output58,982 tokens (best)8,000 tokens4,096 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesNoNo
Tool callingNoYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenApache-2.0Open
API model ID——phi-4-mini
API providers3 (best)12
ReleasedMar 10, 2025Jun 30, 2025Feb 26, 2025
Knowledge cutoffJan 31, 2025—Jun 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Reka Flash 3$1.40
  • ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B$1.26
  • Phi-4-mini$1.35
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Reka Flash 3, ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B or Phi-4-mini?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B 57/100, Phi-4-mini 56/100, Reka Flash 3 50/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B on price and ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Reka Flash 3, ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B or Phi-4-mini?

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B is cheaper at $0.07 input / $0.28 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Reka Flash 3 costs $0.10 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers); Phi-4-mini costs $0.075 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (official Azure API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.122 per million tokens for ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B versus $0.125 for Reka Flash 3 (1× as much) and $0.131 for Phi-4-mini (1.1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Reka Flash 3 has not been scored yet, ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B has not been scored yet and Phi-4-mini has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Reka Flash 3, ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B and Phi-4-mini yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Reka Flash 3 does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Phi-4-mini and 65,536 for Reka Flash 3. Maximum output per response: Reka Flash 3 up to 58,982, ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B up to 8,000, Phi-4-mini up to 4,096 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Reka Flash 3 accepts text; ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B accepts text; Phi-4-mini accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache-2.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B is the newest, released Jun 30, 2025. Reka Flash 3 came out Mar 10, 2025; Phi-4-mini came out Feb 26, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Reka Flash 3 Jan 31, 2025, Phi-4-mini Jun 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.