ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Qwen3-VL Plus vs Qwen3 Coder Flash

Qwen3-VL Plus comes out ahead, 58 to 51 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3-VL Plus

    Released Sep 23, 2025

    58/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.20 / $1.60
    • Context262K
    Full specs Remove Qwen3-VL Plus

  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3 Coder Flash

    Released Jul 28, 2025

    51/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.30 / $1.50
    • Context1M
    Full specs Remove Qwen3 Coder Flash

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Qwen3-VL Plus is our pick

Qwen3-VL Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against Qwen3 Coder Flash (51). It leads on price and inputs & features. Qwen3 Coder Flash wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3-VL PlusQwen3-VL Plus $0.55 · Qwen3 Coder Flash $0.60 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3 Coder FlashQwen3 Coder Flash 1,000,000 · Qwen3-VL Plus 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3-VL PlusQwen3-VL Plus: Text, Images · Qwen3 Coder Flash: Text
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen3-VL PlusQwen3 Coder Flash
Price50%6058
Inputs & features30%7035
Context window20%3760
Overall100%58/10051/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen3-VL Plus vs Qwen3 Coder Flash specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen3-VL PlusAlibaba (Qwen)Qwen3 Coder FlashAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.20 (best)$0.30
Output$1.60$1.50 (best)
Cached input$0.04 (best)$0.06
Blended (3:1)$0.55 (best)$0.60
Long-context rateOver 32K: $0.30 / $2.40Over 32K: $0.50 / $2.50
Price sourceOfficial Alibaba APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)
Max output32,768 tokens65,536 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesNo
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
API model IDqwen3-vl-plusqwen3-coder-flash
API providers610 (best)
ReleasedSep 23, 2025Jul 28, 2025
Knowledge cutoffApr 2025Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen3-VL Plus$5.20
  • Qwen3 Coder Flash$6.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen3-VL Plus or Qwen3 Coder Flash?

Qwen3-VL Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against Qwen3 Coder Flash (51). It leads on price and inputs & features. Qwen3 Coder Flash wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3-VL Plus or Qwen3 Coder Flash?

Qwen3-VL Plus is cheaper at $0.20 input / $1.60 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Qwen3 Coder Flash costs $0.30 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.55 per million tokens for Qwen3-VL Plus versus $0.60 for Qwen3 Coder Flash (1.1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen3-VL Plus has not been scored yet and Qwen3 Coder Flash has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3-VL Plus and Qwen3 Coder Flash yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Flash has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3-VL Plus. Maximum output per response: Qwen3-VL Plus up to 32,768, Qwen3 Coder Flash up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen3-VL Plus accepts text and images; Qwen3 Coder Flash accepts text. Qwen3-VL Plus handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Qwen3-VL Plus and Qwen3 Coder Flash are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Qwen3-VL Plus is the newest, released Sep 23, 2025. Qwen3 Coder Flash came out Jul 28, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3-VL Plus Apr 2025, Qwen3 Coder Flash Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons