ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct vs Qwen3-VL Plus

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct comes out ahead, 62 to 58 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

    Released Oct 4, 2025

    62/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.60
    • Context262K
    Full specs Remove Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3-VL Plus

    Released Sep 23, 2025

    58/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.20 / $1.60
    • Context262K
    Full specs Remove Qwen3-VL Plus

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is our pick

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Qwen3-VL Plus (58). It leads on price. Qwen3-VL Plus wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructQwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct $0.263 · Qwen3-VL Plus $0.55 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameQwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct 262,144 · Qwen3-VL Plus 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructQwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct: Text, Images, Video · Qwen3-VL Plus: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructQwen3-VL Plus
Price50%7460
Inputs & features30%6070
Context window20%3737
Overall100%62/10058/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct vs Qwen3-VL Plus specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)Qwen3-VL PlusAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.15 (best)$0.20
Output$0.60 (best)$1.60
Cached input—$0.04
Blended (3:1)$0.263 (best)$0.55
Long-context rateSame rateOver 32K: $0.30 / $2.40
Price sourceMedian of 13 providersOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens262,144 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens32,768 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoYesNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenApache-2.0Proprietary
API model ID—qwen3-vl-plus
API providers13 (best)6
ReleasedOct 4, 2025Sep 23, 2025
Knowledge cutoff—Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct$2.70
  • Qwen3-VL Plus$5.20
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct or Qwen3-VL Plus?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Qwen3-VL Plus (58). It leads on price. Qwen3-VL Plus wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct or Qwen3-VL Plus?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (median across 13 API providers). Qwen3-VL Plus costs $0.20 input / $1.60 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.263 per million tokens for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct versus $0.55 for Qwen3-VL Plus (2.1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct has not been scored yet and Qwen3-VL Plus has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct and Qwen3-VL Plus yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct and Qwen3-VL Plus share the same 262,144-token context window. Maximum output per response: Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct up to 32,768, Qwen3-VL Plus up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct accepts text, images and video; Qwen3-VL Plus accepts text and images. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Qwen3-VL Plus is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is the newest, released Oct 4, 2025. Qwen3-VL Plus came out Sep 23, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3-VL Plus Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons