Qwen3 Coder Plus vs Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 vs Palmyra X5
Palmyra X5 comes out ahead, 47 to 42 and 37 on our weighted score, though Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 is 2.1× cheaper per token.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3 Coder Plus
37/100- ECI—
- Price$1.00 / $5.00
- Context1.05M
- Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
42/100- ECI143.8
- Price$0.30 / $2.90
- Context262K
- Our pick
Writer
Palmyra X5
47/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $6.00
- Context1M
Palmyra X5 is our pick
Palmyra X5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 47/100 against Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 (42) and Qwen3 Coder Plus (37). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 $0.95 · Palmyra X5 $1.95 · Qwen3 Coder Plus $2.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3 Coder PlusQwen3 Coder Plus 1,048,576 · Palmyra X5 1,000,000 · Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsPalmyra X5Qwen3 Coder Plus: Text · Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507: Text · Palmyra X5: Text, Images
- Self-hostingQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507Publishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3 Coder Plus | Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 | Palmyra X5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 34 | 49 | 35 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 35 | 60 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 37 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 37/100 | 42/100 | 47/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3 Coder PlusAlibaba (Qwen) | Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507Alibaba (Qwen) | Palmyra X5Writer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | 143.8 | — |
| ECI rank | — | #93 of 165 | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 80.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 86.7% | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | 40.4% | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $1.00 | $0.30 (best) | $0.60 |
| Output | $5.00 | $2.90 (best) | $6.00 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $2.00 | $0.95 (best) | $1.95 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Median of 11 providers | Median of 4 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens | 81,920 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenApache 2.0 | Proprietary |
| API model ID | qwen3-coder-plus | — | — |
| API providers | 5 | 12 (best) | 4 |
| Released | Jul 23, 2025 | Jul 25, 2025 | Apr 28, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2025 | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3 Coder Plus$20.00
- Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507$8.80
- Palmyra X5$18.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3 Coder Plus, Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 or Palmyra X5?
Palmyra X5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 47/100 against Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 (42) and Qwen3 Coder Plus (37). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder Plus, Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 or Palmyra X5?
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper at $0.30 input / $2.90 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). Palmyra X5 costs $0.60 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers); Qwen3 Coder Plus costs $1.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.95 per million tokens for Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 versus $1.95 for Palmyra X5 (2.1× as much) and $2.00 for Qwen3 Coder Plus (2.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen3 Coder Plus has not been scored yet, Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 has an ECI of 143.8 and Palmyra X5 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3 Coder Plus, Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 and Palmyra X5 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3 Coder Plus has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Palmyra X5 and 262,144 for Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507. Maximum output per response: Qwen3 Coder Plus up to 65,536, Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 up to 81,920, Palmyra X5 up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3 Coder Plus accepts text; Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 accepts text; Palmyra X5 accepts text and images. Palmyra X5 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 publishes its weights (Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; Qwen3 Coder Plus and Palmyra X5 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 is the newest, released Jul 25, 2025. Qwen3 Coder Plus came out Jul 23, 2025; Palmyra X5 came out Apr 28, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3 Coder Plus Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Qwen3 Coder Plus vs Hermes 4 405BNous Research
- Qwen3 Coder Plus vs o4-mini-deep-researchOpenAI
- Qwen3 Coder Plus vs Morph V3 LargeMorph
- Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 vs GLM-4.7Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 143.7
- Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5 MiniOpenAI · ECI 145.4
- Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 vs DeepSeek R1 0528DeepSeek · ECI 141.2
