ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Hy3 vs Grok 4.7

Hy3 comes out ahead, 58 to 50 and 47 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.8 Max 0902

    Released Sep 2, 2026

    50/100
    • ECI155.2
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context1M
  2. Our pick

    Tencent

    Hy3

    Released Jul 6, 2026

    58/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.132 / $0.53
    • Context256K
  3. xAI

    Grok 4.7

    Released Sep 21, 2026

    47/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context500K
01 — Verdict

Hy3 is our pick

Hy3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against Qwen3.8 Max 0902 (50) and Grok 4.7 (47). It leads on price. Qwen3.8 Max 0902 wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceHy3Hy3 $0.232 · Qwen3.8 Max 0902 $3.00 · Grok 4.7 $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3.8 Max 0902Qwen3.8 Max 0902 1,000,000 · Grok 4.7 500,000 · Hy3 256,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3.8 Max 0902Qwen3.8 Max 0902: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · Hy3: Text · Grok 4.7: Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingHy3Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen3.8 Max 0902Hy3Grok 4.7
Price50%278027
Inputs & features30%803580
Context window20%603648
Overall100%50/10058/10047/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Hy3 vs Grok 4.7 specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen3.8 Max 0902Alibaba (Qwen)Hy3TencentGrok 4.7xAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)155.2——
ECI rank#28 of 148——
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions92.3%—92.7% (best)
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics65.6% (best)—53.0%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics100% (best)—98.1%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions47.3%—56.0% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$2.00$0.132 (best)$2.00
Output$6.00$0.53 (best)$6.00
Cached input——$0.50
Blended (3:1)$3.00$0.232 (best)$3.00
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateOver 200K: $4.00 / $12.00
Price sourceMedian of 6 providersMedian of 15 providersOfficial xAI API
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens (best)256,000 tokens500,000 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens128,000 tokens500,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoYes
PDFsYesNoYes
AudioNoNoNo
VideoYesNoNo
ReasoningYesYeshighYeslow · medium · high · xhigh
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenProprietary
API model ID—hy3grok-4.7
API providers618 (best)17
ReleasedSep 2, 2026Jul 6, 2026Sep 21, 2026
Knowledge cutoff——May 2026
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen3.8 Max 0902$32.00
  • Hy3$2.38
  • Grok 4.7$32.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen3.8 Max 0902, Hy3 or Grok 4.7?

Hy3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against Qwen3.8 Max 0902 (50) and Grok 4.7 (47). It leads on price. Qwen3.8 Max 0902 wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Max 0902, Hy3 or Grok 4.7?

Hy3 is cheaper at $0.132 input / $0.53 output per million tokens (median across 15 API providers; free on Tencent TokenHub). Qwen3.8 Max 0902 costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 6 API providers); Grok 4.7 costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.232 per million tokens for Hy3 versus $3.00 for Qwen3.8 Max 0902 (13× as much) and $3.00 for Grok 4.7 (13× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen3.8 Max 0902 has an ECI of 155.2, Hy3 has not been scored yet and Grok 4.7 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3.8 Max 0902, Hy3 and Grok 4.7 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 500,000 for Grok 4.7 and 256,000 for Hy3. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.8 Max 0902 up to 131,072, Hy3 up to 128,000, Grok 4.7 up to 500,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 accepts text, images, PDFs and video; Hy3 accepts text; Grok 4.7 accepts text, images and PDFs. Qwen3.8 Max 0902 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Hy3 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen3.8 Max 0902 and Grok 4.7 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Grok 4.7 is the newest, released Sep 21, 2026. Qwen3.8 Max 0902 came out Sep 2, 2026; Hy3 came out Jul 6, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Grok 4.7 May 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.