Hy3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
Hy3 comes out ahead, 58 to 53 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
TencentHy3
58/100- ECI—
- Price$0.132 / $0.53
- Context256K
OpenBMB
MiniCPM5-2B
53/100- ECI—
- Price$0.124 / $0.743
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Hy3 is our pick
Hy3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against MiniCPM5-2B (53). It leads on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceHy3Hy3 $0.232 · MiniCPM5-2B $0.279 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextHy3Hy3 256,000 · MiniCPM5-2B 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsHy3: Text · MiniCPM5-2B: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Hy3 | MiniCPM5-2B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 80 | 76 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 36 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 58/100 | 53/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Hy3Tencent | MiniCPM5-2BOpenBMB |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.132 | $0.124 (best) |
| Output | $0.53 (best) | $0.743 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.232 (best) | $0.279 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 15 providers | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 256,000 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeshigh | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Openapache-2.0 |
| API model ID | hy3 | — |
| API providers | 18 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Jul 6, 2026 | Sep 6, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Hy3$2.38
- MiniCPM5-2B$2.73
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Hy3 or MiniCPM5-2B?
Hy3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against MiniCPM5-2B (53). It leads on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Hy3 or MiniCPM5-2B?
Hy3 is cheaper at $0.132 input / $0.53 output per million tokens (median across 15 API providers; free on Tencent TokenHub). MiniCPM5-2B costs $0.124 input / $0.743 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.232 per million tokens for Hy3 versus $0.279 for MiniCPM5-2B (1.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Hy3 has not been scored yet and MiniCPM5-2B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Hy3 and MiniCPM5-2B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Hy3 has the largest context window at 256,000 tokens, against 131,072 for MiniCPM5-2B. Maximum output per response: Hy3 up to 128,000, MiniCPM5-2B up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Hy3 accepts text; MiniCPM5-2B accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (apache-2.0), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
MiniCPM5-2B is the newest, released Sep 6, 2026. Hy3 came out Jul 6, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
