ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Qwen3.8 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B

Qwen3.8 Flash comes out ahead, 74 to 71 and 68 on our weighted score, though Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is 2.5× cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.8 Flash

    Released Aug 26, 2026

    74/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.47
    • Context1M
  2. NVIDIA

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B

    Released Aug 11, 2026

    68/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.055 / $0.20
    • Context262K
  3. NVIDIA

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B

    Released Oct 15, 2026New

    71/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.50
    • Context1.05M
01 — Verdict

Qwen3.8 Flash is our pick

Qwen3.8 Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 74/100 against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B (71) and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B (68). It leads on inputs & features. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B $0.091 · Qwen3.8 Flash $0.23 · Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B $0.237 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextNemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12BNemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B 1,048,576 · Qwen3.8 Flash 1,000,000 · Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3.8 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12BQwen3.8 Flash: Text, Images, Video · Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B: Text · Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12BPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen3.8 FlashNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
Price50%779576
Inputs & features30%804570
Context window20%603761
Overall100%74/10068/10071/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen3.8 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen3.8 FlashAlibaba (Qwen)Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIANemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12BNVIDIA
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.15$0.055 (best)$0.15
Output$0.47$0.20 (best)$0.50
Cached input$0.016——
Blended (3:1)$0.23$0.091 (best)$0.237
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Alibaba APIMedian of 10 providersMedian of 11 providers
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens262,144 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Max output131,072 tokens262,144 tokens (best)8,192 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoYesNoYes
ReasoningYeslow · medium · xhighYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenOpen
API model IDqwen3.8-flashnvidia/nemotron-3.5-lightning-30b-a3bnvidia/nemotron-3.5-super-vl-120b-a12b
API providers28 (best)1513
ReleasedAug 26, 2026Aug 11, 2026Oct 15, 2026
Knowledge cutoff—Sep 2025—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen3.8 Flash$2.44
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B$0.95
  • Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B$2.50
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen3.8 Flash, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B?

Qwen3.8 Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 74/100 against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B (71) and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B (68). It leads on inputs & features. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Flash, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is cheaper at $0.055 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 10 API providers; free on Nvidia). Qwen3.8 Flash costs $0.15 input / $0.47 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B costs $0.15 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers; free on Nvidia). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.091 per million tokens for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B versus $0.23 for Qwen3.8 Flash (2.5× as much) and $0.237 for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B (2.6× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen3.8 Flash has not been scored yet, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B has not been scored yet and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3.8 Flash, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Qwen3.8 Flash and 262,144 for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.8 Flash up to 131,072, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B up to 262,144, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen3.8 Flash accepts text, images and video; Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B accepts text; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B accepts text, images and video. Qwen3.8 Flash handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen3.8 Flash is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B is the newest, released Oct 15, 2026. Qwen3.8 Flash came out Aug 26, 2026; Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B came out Aug 11, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B Sep 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.