Qwen3.8 27B vs Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Inkling Small
Gemini 3 Flash Preview comes out ahead, 72 to 68 and 66 on our weighted score, though Inkling Small is 29% cheaper per token.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8 27B
66/100- ECI151.8
- Price$0.40 / $2.55
- Context262K
- Our pick
GoogleGemini 3 Flash Preview
72/100- ECI152.0
- Price$0.50 / $3.00
- Context1.05M
Thinking MachinesInkling Small
68/100- ECI150.5
- Price$0.58 / $1.44
- Context1.05M
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is our pick
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against Inkling Small (68) and Qwen3.8 27B (66). It leads on inputs & features. Inkling Small wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGemini 3 Flash PreviewCapabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 3 Flash Preview 152.0 · Qwen3.8 27B 151.8 · Inkling Small 150.5
- Lowest priceInkling SmallInkling Small $0.795 · Qwen3.8 27B $0.938 · Gemini 3 Flash Preview $1.13 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 3 Flash Preview and Inkling SmallGemini 3 Flash Preview 1,048,576 · Inkling Small 1,048,576 · Qwen3.8 27B 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 3 Flash PreviewQwen3.8 27B: Text, Images, Video · Gemini 3 Flash Preview: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Inkling Small: Text, Images, Audio
- Self-hostingQwen3.8 27B and Inkling SmallPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3.8 27B | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Inkling Small |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 79 | 79 | 77 |
| Price | 25% | 49 | 45 | 52 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 70 | 100 | 70 |
| Context window | 10% | 37 | 61 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 66/100 | 72/100 | 68/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3.8 27BAlibaba (Qwen) | Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGoogle | Inkling SmallThinking Machines |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 151.8 | 152.0 (best) | 150.5 |
| ECI rank | #54 of 165 | #53 of 165 (best) | #58 of 165 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 89.4% (best) | 88.5% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | 51.2% (best) | 46.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 95.6% (best) | 90.0% |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | — | 75.4% | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | 66.8% (best) | 19.1% |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.40 (best) | $0.50 | $0.58 |
| Output | $2.55 | $3.00 | $1.44 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.05 (best) | $0.116 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.938 | $1.13 | $0.795 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 49 providers | Official Google API | Official Thinking Machines API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 1,048,576 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens | 65,536 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | Yes | Yes |
| Video | Yes | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yesminimal · low · medium · high | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | OpenApache-2.0 |
| API model ID | — | gemini-3-flash-preview | thinkingmachines/Inkling-Small |
| API providers | 53 (best) | 31 | 12 |
| Released | Aug 14, 2026 | Dec 17, 2025 | Jul 30, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Jan 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3.8 27B$9.10
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview$11.00
- Inkling Small$8.68
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3.8 27B, Gemini 3 Flash Preview or Inkling Small?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against Inkling Small (68) and Qwen3.8 27B (66). It leads on inputs & features. Inkling Small wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 27B, Gemini 3 Flash Preview or Inkling Small?
Inkling Small is cheaper at $0.58 input / $1.44 output per million tokens (official Thinking Machines API price). Qwen3.8 27B costs $0.40 input / $2.55 output per million tokens (median across 49 API providers); Gemini 3 Flash Preview costs $0.50 input / $3.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.795 per million tokens for Inkling Small versus $0.938 for Qwen3.8 27B (1.2× as much) and $1.13 for Gemini 3 Flash Preview (1.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 3 Flash Preview 152.0 (#53 of 165), Qwen3.8 27B 151.8 (#54 of 165) and Inkling Small 150.5 (#58 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (150.6–153.7 vs 149.9–153.6), so treat the gap as small.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3.8 27B and Inkling Small yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Inkling Small have the largest context windows (1,048,576 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 262,144 for Qwen3.8 27B. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.8 27B up to 32,768, Gemini 3 Flash Preview up to 65,536, Inkling Small up to 1,048,576 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3.8 27B accepts text, images and video; Gemini 3 Flash Preview accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Inkling Small accepts text, images and audio. Gemini 3 Flash Preview handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3.8 27B and Inkling Small publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Gemini 3 Flash Preview is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen3.8 27B is the newest, released Aug 14, 2026. Inkling Small came out Jul 30, 2026; Gemini 3 Flash Preview came out Dec 17, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 3 Flash Preview Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Qwen3.8 27B vs Mistral Large 4Mistral AI · ECI 150.6
- Qwen3.8 27B vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek · ECI 155.9
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)xAI · ECI 152.3
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI · ECI 148.1
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs GLM-5.2Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 152.1
- Inkling Small vs Mistral Large 4Mistral AI · ECI 150.6
