ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base vs Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Mistral Large 3

Seed 2.1 Turbo comes out ahead, 56 to 52 and 45 on our weighted score, though Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base is 17% cheaper per token.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base

    Released Feb 24, 2026

    45/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.54 / $1.33
    • Context262K
  2. Our pick

    ByteDance Seed

    Seed 2.1 Turbo

    Released Jun 23, 2026

    56/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.445 / $2.23
    • Context256K
  3. Mistral AI

    Mistral Large 3

    Released Dec 2, 2025

    52/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.50 / $1.50
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Seed 2.1 Turbo is our pick

Seed 2.1 Turbo is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Mistral Large 3 (52) and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base (45). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3.5 35B-A3B BaseQwen3.5 35B-A3B Base $0.739 · Mistral Large 3 $0.75 · Seed 2.1 Turbo $0.891 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3.5 35B-A3B Base and Mistral Large 3Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base 262,144 · Mistral Large 3 262,144 · Seed 2.1 Turbo 256,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3.5 35B-A3B Base and Seed 2.1 TurboQwen3.5 35B-A3B Base: Text, Images, Video · Seed 2.1 Turbo: Text, Images, Video · Mistral Large 3: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingQwen3.5 35B-A3B Base and Mistral Large 3Publishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen3.5 35B-A3B BaseSeed 2.1 TurboMistral Large 3
Price50%545053
Inputs & features30%358060
Context window20%373637
Overall100%45/10056/10052/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base vs Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Mistral Large 3 specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen3.5 35B-A3B BaseAlibaba (Qwen)Seed 2.1 TurboByteDance SeedMistral Large 3Mistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.54$0.445 (best)$0.50
Output$1.33 (best)$2.23$1.50
Cached input—$0.089$0.05 (best)
Blended (3:1)$0.739 (best)$0.891$0.75
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersOfficial Volcengine Ark APIOfficial Mistral API
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens (best)256,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Max output65,536 tokens256,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoYesYesNo
ReasoningNoYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · maxNo
Tool callingNoYesYes
Structured outputNoYesYes
Availability
WeightsOpenApache-2.0ProprietaryOpen
API model ID—doubao-seed-2-1-turbo-260628mistral-large-2512
API providers1817 (best)
ReleasedFeb 24, 2026Jun 23, 2026Dec 2, 2025
Knowledge cutoff——Nov 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base$8.07
  • Seed 2.1 Turbo$8.91
  • Mistral Large 3$8.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base, Seed 2.1 Turbo or Mistral Large 3?

Seed 2.1 Turbo is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Mistral Large 3 (52) and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base (45). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base, Seed 2.1 Turbo or Mistral Large 3?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base is cheaper at $0.54 input / $1.33 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Mistral Large 3 costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price); Seed 2.1 Turbo costs $0.445 input / $2.23 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.739 per million tokens for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base versus $0.75 for Mistral Large 3 (1× as much) and $0.891 for Seed 2.1 Turbo (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base has not been scored yet, Seed 2.1 Turbo has not been scored yet and Mistral Large 3 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base, Seed 2.1 Turbo and Mistral Large 3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base and Mistral Large 3 have the largest context windows (262,144 and 262,144 tokens), against 256,000 for Seed 2.1 Turbo. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base up to 65,536, Seed 2.1 Turbo up to 256,000, Mistral Large 3 up to 262,144 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base accepts text, images and video; Seed 2.1 Turbo accepts text, images and video; Mistral Large 3 accepts text and images. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base and Mistral Large 3 publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.1 Turbo is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Seed 2.1 Turbo is the newest, released Jun 23, 2026. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base came out Feb 24, 2026; Mistral Large 3 came out Dec 2, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Large 3 Nov 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.