Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base vs Qwen3.5 27B
Qwen3.5 27B comes out ahead, 57 to 45 on our weighted score, though Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base is 10% cheaper per token.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base
45/100- ECI—
- Price$0.54 / $1.33
- Context262K
- Our pickAlibaba (Qwen)
Qwen3.5 27B
57/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $2.40
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Qwen3.5 27B is our pick
Qwen3.5 27B is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base (45). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3.5 35B-A3B BaseQwen3.5 35B-A3B Base $0.739 · Qwen3.5 27B $0.825 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameQwen3.5 35B-A3B Base 262,144 · Qwen3.5 27B 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsQwen3.5 35B-A3B Base: Text, Images, Video · Qwen3.5 27B: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 54 | 52 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 45/100 | 57/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B BaseAlibaba (Qwen) | Qwen3.5 27BAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.54 | $0.30 (best) |
| Output | $1.33 (best) | $2.40 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.739 (best) | $0.825 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | OpenApache-2.0 | Open |
| API model ID | — | qwen3.5-27b |
| API providers | 1 | 19 (best) |
| Released | Feb 24, 2026 | Feb 23, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base$8.07
- Qwen3.5 27B$7.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base or Qwen3.5 27B?
Qwen3.5 27B is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base (45). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base or Qwen3.5 27B?
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base is cheaper at $0.54 input / $1.33 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Qwen3.5 27B costs $0.30 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.739 per million tokens for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base versus $0.825 for Qwen3.5 27B (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base has not been scored yet and Qwen3.5 27B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base and Qwen3.5 27B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base and Qwen3.5 27B share the same 262,144-token context window. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base up to 65,536, Qwen3.5 27B up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base accepts text, images and video; Qwen3.5 27B accepts text, images and video. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (Apache-2.0), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base is the newest, released Feb 24, 2026. Qwen3.5 27B came out Feb 23, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
