ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Qwen3 32B vs Mistral Medium 3 vs DeepSeek-R1

Too close to call on our weighted score (Mistral Medium 3 53, DeepSeek-R1 51, Qwen3 32B 51). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3 32B

    Released Apr 29, 2025

    51/100
    • ECI138.5
    • Price$0.70 / $2.80
    • Context131K
  2. Mistral AI

    Mistral Medium 3

    Released May 7, 2025

    53/100
    • ECI134.1
    • Price$0.40 / $2.00
    • Context131K
  3. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek-R1

    Released Jan 20, 2025

    51/100
    • ECI139.0
    • Price$0.70 / $2.60
    • Context128K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Mistral Medium 3 53/100, DeepSeek-R1 51/100, Qwen3 32B 51/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: DeepSeek-R1 for raw capability and Mistral Medium 3 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityDeepSeek-R1Capabilities Index (ECI): DeepSeek-R1 139.0 · Qwen3 32B 138.5 · Mistral Medium 3 134.1
  • Lowest priceMistral Medium 3Mistral Medium 3 $0.80 · DeepSeek-R1 $1.18 · Qwen3 32B $1.23 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3 32B and Mistral Medium 3Qwen3 32B 131,072 · Mistral Medium 3 131,072 · DeepSeek-R1 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsMistral Medium 3Qwen3 32B: Text · Mistral Medium 3: Text, Images · DeepSeek-R1: Text
  • Self-hostingQwen3 32B and DeepSeek-R1Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen3 32BMistral Medium 3DeepSeek-R1
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%645864
Price25%465447
Inputs & features15%355035
Context window10%242424
Overall100%51/10053/10051/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen3 32B vs Mistral Medium 3 vs DeepSeek-R1 specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen3 32BAlibaba (Qwen)Mistral Medium 3Mistral AIDeepSeek-R1DeepSeek
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)138.5134.1139.0 (best)
ECI rank#106 of 148#117 of 148#104 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions65.7%59.5%71.7% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics66.9% (best)32.2%53.3%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.70$0.40 (best)$0.70
Output$2.80$2.00 (best)$2.60
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$1.23$0.80 (best)$1.18
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Alibaba APIOfficial Mistral APIMedian of 11 providers
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens (best)131,072 tokens (best)128,000 tokens
Max output16,384 tokens131,072 tokens (best)32,768 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesNoYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietaryOpen
API model IDqwen3-32bmistral-medium-2505—
API providers14 (best)512
ReleasedApr 29, 2025May 7, 2025Jan 20, 2025
Knowledge cutoffApr 2025May 2025Jul 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen3 32B$12.60
  • Mistral Medium 3$8.00
  • DeepSeek-R1$12.20
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen3 32B, Mistral Medium 3 or DeepSeek-R1?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Mistral Medium 3 53/100, DeepSeek-R1 51/100, Qwen3 32B 51/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: DeepSeek-R1 for raw capability and Mistral Medium 3 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 32B, Mistral Medium 3 or DeepSeek-R1?

Mistral Medium 3 is cheaper at $0.40 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). DeepSeek-R1 costs $0.70 input / $2.60 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers); Qwen3 32B costs $0.70 input / $2.80 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.80 per million tokens for Mistral Medium 3 versus $1.18 for DeepSeek-R1 (1.5× as much) and $1.23 for Qwen3 32B (1.5× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

DeepSeek-R1 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): DeepSeek-R1 139.0 (#104 of 148), Qwen3 32B 138.5 (#106 of 148) and Mistral Medium 3 134.1 (#117 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (136.2–140.4 vs 135.1–140.4), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — DeepSeek-R1 71.7%, Qwen3 32B 65.7%, Mistral Medium 3 59.5%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3 32B 66.9%, DeepSeek-R1 53.3%, Mistral Medium 3 32.2%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3 32B, Mistral Medium 3 and DeepSeek-R1 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, DeepSeek-R1 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 32B and Mistral Medium 3 have the largest context windows (131,072 and 131,072 tokens), against 128,000 for DeepSeek-R1. Maximum output per response: Qwen3 32B up to 16,384, Mistral Medium 3 up to 131,072, DeepSeek-R1 up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen3 32B accepts text; Mistral Medium 3 accepts text and images; DeepSeek-R1 accepts text. Mistral Medium 3 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3 32B and DeepSeek-R1 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Mistral Medium 3 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Mistral Medium 3 is the newest, released May 7, 2025. Qwen3 32B came out Apr 29, 2025; DeepSeek-R1 came out Jan 20, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3 32B Apr 2025, Mistral Medium 3 May 2025, DeepSeek-R1 Jul 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.