Qwen3 235B-A22B vs Llama-3.2-3B
Llama-3.2-3B comes out ahead, 49 to 38 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3 235B-A22B
38/100- ECI139.4
- Price$0.70 / $2.80
- Context131K
- Our pick
MetaLlama-3.2-3B
49/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.335
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Llama-3.2-3B is our pick
Llama-3.2-3B is the better all-round choice, scoring 49/100 against Qwen3 235B-A22B (38). It leads on price. Qwen3 235B-A22B wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceLlama-3.2-3BLlama-3.2-3B $0.159 · Qwen3 235B-A22B $1.23 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameQwen3 235B-A22B 131,072 · Llama-3.2-3B 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsQwen3 235B-A22B: Text · Llama-3.2-3B: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3 235B-A22B | Llama-3.2-3B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 46 | 88 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 0 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 38/100 | 49/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3 235B-A22BAlibaba (Qwen) | Llama-3.2-3BMeta |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 139.4 | — |
| ECI rank | #103 of 148 | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 70.7% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.70 | $0.10 (best) |
| Output | $2.80 | $0.335 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.23 | $0.159 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Median of 3 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 16,384 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | OpenLlama 3.2 Community License |
| API model ID | qwen3-235b-a22b | — |
| API providers | 7 (best) | 3 |
| Released | Apr 28, 2025 | Sep 25, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2025 | Dec 2023 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3 235B-A22B$12.60
- Llama-3.2-3B$1.67
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3 235B-A22B or Llama-3.2-3B?
Llama-3.2-3B is the better all-round choice, scoring 49/100 against Qwen3 235B-A22B (38). It leads on price. Qwen3 235B-A22B wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 235B-A22B or Llama-3.2-3B?
Llama-3.2-3B is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.335 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Qwen3 235B-A22B costs $0.70 input / $2.80 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.159 per million tokens for Llama-3.2-3B versus $1.23 for Qwen3 235B-A22B (7.7× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen3 235B-A22B has an ECI of 139.4 and Llama-3.2-3B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3 235B-A22B and Llama-3.2-3B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Llama-3.2-3B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3 235B-A22B and Llama-3.2-3B share the same 131,072-token context window. Maximum output per response: Qwen3 235B-A22B up to 16,384, Llama-3.2-3B up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3 235B-A22B accepts text; Llama-3.2-3B accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (Llama 3.2 Community License), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Qwen3 235B-A22B is the newest, released Apr 28, 2025. Llama-3.2-3B came out Sep 25, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3 235B-A22B Apr 2025, Llama-3.2-3B Dec 2023.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add DeepSeek-R1Three-way comparison
- Qwen3 235B-A22B vs DeepSeek-R1DeepSeek · ECI 139.0
- Qwen3 235B-A22B vs Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle · ECI 140.8
- Qwen3 235B-A22B vs GPT-4.1 miniOpenAI · ECI 135.0
- Qwen3 235B-A22B vs Mistral Medium 3Mistral AI · ECI 134.1
- Llama-3.2-3B vs Pixtral 12BMistral AI
- Llama-3.2-3B vs solar-miniUpstage
