Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 vs o4-mini-deep-research vs GLM-4.7
Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 42, GLM-4.7 41, o4-mini-deep-research 37). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
42/100- ECI143.8
- Price$0.30 / $2.90
- Context262K
OpenAIo4-mini-deep-research
37/100- ECI—
- Price$1.80 / $7.20
- Context200K
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.7
41/100- ECI143.7
- Price$0.60 / $2.20
- Context205K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 42/100, GLM-4.7 41/100, o4-mini-deep-research 37/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 on price and Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 $0.95 · GLM-4.7 $1.00 · o4-mini-deep-research $3.15 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 262,144 · GLM-4.7 204,800 · o4-mini-deep-research 200,000 tokens
- Widest inputso4-mini-deep-researchQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507: Text · o4-mini-deep-research: Text, Images · GLM-4.7: Text
- Self-hostingQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 and GLM-4.7Publishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 | o4-mini-deep-research | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 49 | 25 | 48 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 60 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 32 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 42/100 | 37/100 | 41/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507Alibaba (Qwen) | o4-mini-deep-researchOpenAI | GLM-4.7Z.ai (Zhipu) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 143.8 (best) | — | 143.7 |
| ECI rank | #93 of 165 (best) | — | #94 of 165 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 80.1% | — | 83.3% (best) |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 86.7% (best) | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 40.4% (best) | — | 32.2% |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.30 (best) | $1.80 | $0.60 |
| Output | $2.90 | $7.20 | $2.20 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | $0.11 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.95 (best) | $3.15 | $1.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 11 providers | Median of 1 providers | Official Z.AI API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens (best) | 200,000 tokens | 204,800 tokens |
| Max output | 81,920 tokens | 100,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenApache 2.0 | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | — | — | glm-4.7 |
| API providers | 12 | 1 | 31 (best) |
| Released | Jul 25, 2025 | Jun 26, 2025 | Dec 22, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | May 2024 | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507$8.80
- o4-mini-deep-research$32.40
- GLM-4.7$10.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507, o4-mini-deep-research or GLM-4.7?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 42/100, GLM-4.7 41/100, o4-mini-deep-research 37/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 on price and Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507, o4-mini-deep-research or GLM-4.7?
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper at $0.30 input / $2.90 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). GLM-4.7 costs $0.60 input / $2.20 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price); o4-mini-deep-research costs $1.80 input / $7.20 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.95 per million tokens for Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 versus $1.00 for GLM-4.7 (1.1× as much) and $3.15 for o4-mini-deep-research (3.3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 has an ECI of 143.8, o4-mini-deep-research has not been scored yet and GLM-4.7 has an ECI of 143.7.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507, o4-mini-deep-research and GLM-4.7 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 204,800 for GLM-4.7 and 200,000 for o4-mini-deep-research. Maximum output per response: Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 up to 81,920, o4-mini-deep-research up to 100,000, GLM-4.7 up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 accepts text; o4-mini-deep-research accepts text and images; GLM-4.7 accepts text. o4-mini-deep-research handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 and GLM-4.7 publishes its weights (Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; o4-mini-deep-research is proprietary.
Which is newer?
GLM-4.7 is the newest, released Dec 22, 2025. Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 came out Jul 25, 2025; o4-mini-deep-research came out Jun 26, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: o4-mini-deep-research May 2024, GLM-4.7 Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5 MiniOpenAI · ECI 145.4
- Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 vs DeepSeek R1 0528DeepSeek · ECI 141.2
- Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 vs Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle · ECI 140.6
- o4-mini-deep-research vs Jamba LargeAI21 Labs
- o4-mini-deep-research vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Google
- o4-mini-deep-research vs Qwen MT PlusAlibaba (Qwen)
