ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT vs GLM-4.7

Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT comes out ahead, 45 to 42 and 41 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507

    Released Jul 25, 2025

    42/100
    • ECI143.8
    • Price$0.30 / $2.90
    • Context262K
  2. Our pick

    AI Singapore

    Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT

    Released Sep 23, 2025

    45/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.351 / $0.555
    • Context128K
  3. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-4.7

    Released Dec 22, 2025

    41/100
    • ECI143.7
    • Price$0.60 / $2.20
    • Context205K
01 — Verdict

Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT is our pick

Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT is the better all-round choice, scoring 45/100 against Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 (42) and GLM-4.7 (41). It leads on price. Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITGemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT $0.402 · Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 $0.95 · GLM-4.7 $1.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 262,144 · GLM-4.7 204,800 · Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507: Text · Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT: Text, Images · GLM-4.7: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITGLM-4.7
Price50%496648
Inputs & features30%352535
Context window20%372432
Overall100%42/10045/10041/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT vs GLM-4.7 specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507Alibaba (Qwen)Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITAI SingaporeGLM-4.7Z.ai (Zhipu)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)143.8 (best)—143.7
ECI rank#93 of 165 (best)—#94 of 165
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions80.1%—83.3% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics86.7% (best)—83.3%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions40.4% (best)—32.2%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.30 (best)$0.351$0.60
Output$2.90$0.555 (best)$2.20
Cached input——$0.11
Blended (3:1)$0.95$0.402 (best)$1.00
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 11 providersMedian of 3 providersOfficial Z.AI API
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens (best)128,000 tokens204,800 tokens
Max output81,920 tokens128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesNoYes
Tool callingYesNoYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenApache 2.0OpenOpen
API model ID——glm-4.7
API providers12331 (best)
ReleasedJul 25, 2025Sep 23, 2025Dec 22, 2025
Knowledge cutoff——Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507$8.80
  • Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT$4.62
  • GLM-4.7$10.40
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507, Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT or GLM-4.7?

Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT is the better all-round choice, scoring 45/100 against Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 (42) and GLM-4.7 (41). It leads on price. Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507, Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT or GLM-4.7?

Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT is cheaper at $0.351 input / $0.555 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.30 input / $2.90 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers); GLM-4.7 costs $0.60 input / $2.20 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.402 per million tokens for Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT versus $0.95 for Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 (2.4× as much) and $1.00 for GLM-4.7 (2.5× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 has an ECI of 143.8, Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT has not been scored yet and GLM-4.7 has an ECI of 143.7.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507, Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT and GLM-4.7 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 204,800 for GLM-4.7 and 128,000 for Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT. Maximum output per response: Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 up to 81,920, Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT up to 128,000, GLM-4.7 up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 accepts text; Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT accepts text and images; GLM-4.7 accepts text. Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

GLM-4.7 is the newest, released Dec 22, 2025. Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-IT came out Sep 23, 2025; Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 came out Jul 25, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GLM-4.7 Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.