Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 comes out ahead, 48 to 42 on our weighted score, though Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 is 3.5× cheaper per token.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
42/100- ECI143.8
- Price$0.30 / $2.90
- Context262K
- Our pick
GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
48/100- ECI—
- Price$1.22 / $9.75
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is our pick
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is the better all-round choice, scoring 48/100 against Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 (42). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 $0.95 · Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 $3.35 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 1,048,576 · Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507: Text · Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio
- Self-hostingQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507Publishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 | Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 49 | 24 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 42/100 | 48/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507Alibaba (Qwen) | Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Google |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 143.8 | — |
| ECI rank | #93 of 165 | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 80.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 86.7% | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 40.4% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.30 (best) | $1.22 |
| Output | $2.90 (best) | $9.75 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.95 (best) | $3.35 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 11 providers | Median of 4 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 81,920 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes |
| Audio | No | Yes |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | OpenApache 2.0 | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 12 (best) | 4 |
| Released | Jul 25, 2025 | Jun 5, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Jan 31, 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507$8.80
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05$31.69
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 or Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05?
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is the better all-round choice, scoring 48/100 against Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 (42). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 or Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05?
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper at $0.30 input / $2.90 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 costs $1.22 input / $9.75 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.95 per million tokens for Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 versus $3.35 for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 (3.5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 has an ECI of 143.8 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507. Maximum output per response: Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 up to 81,920, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 accepts text; Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 accepts text, images, PDFs and audio. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 publishes its weights (Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 is the newest, released Jul 25, 2025. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 came out Jun 5, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 Jan 31, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add GLM-4.7Three-way comparison
- Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 vs GLM-4.7Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 143.7
- Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5 MiniOpenAI · ECI 145.4
- Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 vs DeepSeek R1 0528DeepSeek · ECI 141.2
- Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 vs Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle · ECI 140.6
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs o4-mini-deep-researchOpenAI
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Jamba LargeAI21 Labs
