Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct vs Mistral Large vs Aya Expanse 32B
Mistral Large comes out ahead, 45 to 39 and 32 on our weighted score.
Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct
39/100- ECI—
- Price$0.66 / $1.00
- Context131K
- Our pick
Mistral AI
Mistral Large
45/100- ECI122.0
- Price$0.50 / $1.50
- Context128K
Cohere
Aya Expanse 32B
32/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $1.50
- Context128K
Mistral Large is our pick
Mistral Large is the better all-round choice, scoring 45/100 against Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct (39) and Aya Expanse 32B (32). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen2.5-Coder-32B-InstructQwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct $0.745 · Mistral Large $0.75 · Aya Expanse 32B $0.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen2.5-Coder-32B-InstructQwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct 131,072 · Mistral Large 128,000 · Aya Expanse 32B 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsMistral LargeQwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct: Text · Mistral Large: Text, PDFs · Aya Expanse 32B: Text
- Self-hostingQwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct and Aya Expanse 32BPublishes downloadable weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0)
| Measure | Weight | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct | Mistral Large | Aya Expanse 32B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 54 | 53 | 53 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 45 | 0 |
| Context window | 20% | 25 | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 39/100 | 45/100 | 32/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | 122.0 | — |
| ECI rank | — | #153 of 165 | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 38.8% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 1.9% | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.66 | $0.50 (best) | $0.50 (best) |
| Output | $1.00 (best) | $1.50 | $1.50 |
| Cached input | — | $0.05 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.745 (best) | $0.75 | $0.75 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 7 providers | Official Mistral API | Official Cohere API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 102,400 tokens (best) | 4,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | No |
| PDFs | No | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | No |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | OpenCC-BY-NC-4.0 |
| API model ID | — | mistral-large-latest | c4ai-aya-expanse-32b |
| API providers | 7 | 11 (best) | 2 |
| Released | Nov 12, 2024 | Feb 26, 2024 | Oct 24, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Nov 30, 2024 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct$8.60
Mistral Large$8.00
Aya Expanse 32B$8.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct, Mistral Large or Aya Expanse 32B?
Mistral Large is the better all-round choice, scoring 45/100 against Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct (39) and Aya Expanse 32B (32). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct, Mistral Large or Aya Expanse 32B?
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct is cheaper at $0.66 input / $1.00 output per million tokens (median across 7 API providers). Mistral Large costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price); Aya Expanse 32B costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.745 per million tokens for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct versus $0.75 for Mistral Large (1× as much) and $0.75 for Aya Expanse 32B (1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct has not been scored yet, Mistral Large has an ECI of 122.0 and Aya Expanse 32B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct, Mistral Large and Aya Expanse 32B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Aya Expanse 32B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Mistral Large and 128,000 for Aya Expanse 32B. Maximum output per response: Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct up to 8,192, Mistral Large up to 102,400, Aya Expanse 32B up to 4,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct accepts text; Mistral Large accepts text and PDFs; Aya Expanse 32B accepts text. Mistral Large handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct and Aya Expanse 32B publishes its weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0) and can be self-hosted; Mistral Large is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct is the newest, released Nov 12, 2024. Aya Expanse 32B came out Oct 24, 2024; Mistral Large came out Feb 26, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Large Nov 30, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.