ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507 vs Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct

Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen2.5 7B Instruct 62, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 62, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 55). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

    Released Sep 19, 2024

    62/100
    • ECI118.5
    • Price$0.05 / $0.10
    • Context131K
  2. Mistral AI

    Voxtral Small 24B 2507

    Released Jul 15, 2025

    55/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.40
    • Context33K
  3. Meta

    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct

    Released Jul 23, 2024

    62/100
    • ECI116.4
    • Price$0.06 / $0.08
    • Context128K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Qwen2.5 7B Instruct 62/100, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 62/100, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 55/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen2.5 7B Instruct on price and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen2.5 7B InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct $0.063 · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct $0.065 · Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $0.175 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen2.5 7B InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct 131,072 · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 128,000 · Voxtral Small 24B 2507 32,768 tokens
  • Widest inputsVoxtral Small 24B 2507Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: Text · Voxtral Small 24B 2507: Text, Audio · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen2.5 7B InstructVoxtral Small 24B 2507Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
Price50%10082100
Inputs & features30%254525
Context window20%25024
Overall100%62/10055/10062/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507 vs Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen2.5 7B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)Voxtral Small 24B 2507Mistral AILlama-3.1-8B-InstructMeta
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)118.5 (best)—116.4
ECI rank#159 of 165 (best)—#162 of 165
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions35.5% (best)—27.0%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics2.5% (best)—1.7%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.05 (best)$0.10$0.06
Output$0.10$0.40$0.08 (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.063 (best)$0.175$0.065
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 3 providersOfficial Mistral APIMedian of 17 providers
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens (best)32,768 tokens128,000 tokens
Max output8,192 tokens32,768 tokens (best)4,096 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoYesNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesNo
Availability
WeightsOpenApache 2.0OpenApache 2.0Open
API model ID—voxtral-small-latest—
API providers41018 (best)
ReleasedSep 19, 2024Jul 15, 2025Jul 23, 2024
Knowledge cutoff——Dec 2023
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen2.5 7B Instruct$0.70
  • Voxtral Small 24B 2507$1.80
  • Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct$0.76
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen2.5 7B Instruct, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 or Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Qwen2.5 7B Instruct 62/100, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 62/100, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 55/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen2.5 7B Instruct on price and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 or Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is cheaper at $0.05 input / $0.10 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct costs $0.06 input / $0.08 output per million tokens (median across 17 API providers); Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.063 per million tokens for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct versus $0.065 for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (1× as much) and $0.175 for Voxtral Small 24B 2507 (2.8× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has an ECI of 118.5, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has not been scored yet and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct has an ECI of 116.4.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and 32,768 for Voxtral Small 24B 2507. Maximum output per response: Qwen2.5 7B Instruct up to 8,192, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 up to 32,768, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct up to 4,096 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct accepts text; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 accepts text and audio; Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct accepts text. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is the newest, released Jul 15, 2025. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct came out Sep 19, 2024; Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct came out Jul 23, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct Dec 2023.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.