Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Mistral Large
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct comes out ahead, 50 to 44 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
50/100- ECI118.5
- Price$0.05 / $0.10
- Context131K
Mistral AI
Mistral Large
44/100- ECI122.0
- Price$0.50 / $1.50
- Context128K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is our pick
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 50/100 against Mistral Large (44). It leads on price. Mistral Large wins on capability and inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityMistral LargeCapabilities Index (ECI): Mistral Large 122.0 · Qwen2.5 7B Instruct 118.5
- Lowest priceQwen2.5 7B InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct $0.063 · Mistral Large $0.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen2.5 7B InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct 131,072 · Mistral Large 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsMistral LargeQwen2.5 7B Instruct: Text · Mistral Large: Text, PDFs
- Self-hostingQwen2.5 7B InstructPublishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 38 | 42 |
| Price | 25% | 100 | 53 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 25 | 45 |
| Context window | 10% | 25 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 50/100 | 44/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 118.5 | 122.0 (best) |
| ECI rank | #159 of 165 | #153 of 165 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 35.5% | 38.8% (best) |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 2.5% (best) | 1.9% |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.05 (best) | $0.50 |
| Output | $0.10 (best) | $1.50 |
| Cached input | — | $0.05 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.063 (best) | $0.75 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 3 providers | Official Mistral API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 102,400 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | Yes |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | OpenApache 2.0 | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | mistral-large-latest |
| API providers | 4 | 11 (best) |
| Released | Sep 19, 2024 | Feb 26, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Nov 30, 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct$0.70
Mistral Large$8.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen2.5 7B Instruct or Mistral Large?
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 50/100 against Mistral Large (44). It leads on price. Mistral Large wins on capability and inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct or Mistral Large?
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is cheaper at $0.05 input / $0.10 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Mistral Large costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.063 per million tokens for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct versus $0.75 for Mistral Large (12× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Mistral Large scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Mistral Large 122.0 (#153 of 165) and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct 118.5 (#159 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (115.7–124.8 vs 110.6–121.2), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Mistral Large 38.8%, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct 35.5%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen2.5 7B Instruct 2.5%, Mistral Large 1.9%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct and Mistral Large yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Mistral Large leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Mistral Large. Maximum output per response: Qwen2.5 7B Instruct up to 8,192, Mistral Large up to 102,400 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct accepts text; Mistral Large accepts text and PDFs. Mistral Large handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct publishes its weights (Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; Mistral Large is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is the newest, released Sep 19, 2024. Mistral Large came out Feb 26, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Large Nov 30, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.