ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) vs Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B

Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B comes out ahead, 51 to 27 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen Plus Character (Japanese)

    Released Jan 2024

    27/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.50 / $1.40
    • Context8K
  2. Our pick

    Nous Research

    Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B

    Released Apr 30, 2024

    51/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.14 / $0.14
    • Context8K
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B is our pick

Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B is the better all-round choice, scoring 51/100 against Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) (27). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceHermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8BHermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B $0.14 · Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) $0.725 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameQwen Plus Character (Japanese) 8,192 · Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B 8,192 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsQwen Plus Character (Japanese): Text · Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B: Text
  • Self-hostingHermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8BPublishes downloadable weights (Llama 3 Community License)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen Plus Character (Japanese)Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B
Price50%5487
Inputs & features30%025
Context window20%00
Overall100%27/10051/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) vs Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen Plus Character (Japanese)Alibaba (Qwen)Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8BNous Research
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.50$0.14 (best)
Output$1.40$0.14 (best)
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$0.725$0.14 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Alibaba APIMedian of 2 providers
Limits
Context window8,192 tokens8,192 tokens
Max output512 tokens8,192 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesNoNo
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingNoYes
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenLlama 3 Community License
API model IDqwen-plus-character-ja—
API providers12 (best)
ReleasedJan 2024Apr 30, 2024
Knowledge cutoffApr 2024—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen Plus Character (Japanese)$7.80
  • Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B$1.68
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) or Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B?

Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B is the better all-round choice, scoring 51/100 against Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) (27). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) or Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B?

Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B is cheaper at $0.14 input / $0.14 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) costs $0.50 input / $1.40 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.14 per million tokens for Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B versus $0.725 for Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) (5.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) has not been scored yet and Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) and Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) and Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B share the same 8,192-token context window. Maximum output per response: Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) up to 512, Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) accepts text; Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B publishes its weights (Llama 3 Community License) and can be self-hosted; Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B is the newest, released Apr 30, 2024. Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) came out Jan 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen Plus Character (Japanese) Apr 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.