Qwen MT Plus vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-5 Chat
Claude Sonnet 5.5 comes out ahead, 46 to 31 and 11 on our weighted score, though GPT-5 Chat is 14% cheaper per token.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen MT Plus
11/100- ECI—
- Price$2.46 / $7.37
- Context16K
- Our pick
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5.5
46/100- ECI166.7
- Price$2.00 / $10.00
- Context1M
OpenAIGPT-5 Chat
31/100- ECI—
- Price$1.25 / $10.00
- Context400K
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is our pick
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 46/100 against GPT-5 Chat (31) and Qwen MT Plus (11). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGPT-5 ChatGPT-5 Chat $3.44 · Qwen MT Plus $3.69 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 $4.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextClaude Sonnet 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5 1,000,000 · GPT-5 Chat 400,000 · Qwen MT Plus 16,384 tokens
- Widest inputsClaude Sonnet 5.5Qwen MT Plus: Text · Claude Sonnet 5.5: Text, Images, PDFs · GPT-5 Chat: Text, Images
- Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Qwen MT Plus | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-5 Chat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 22 | 20 | 23 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 0 | 80 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 0 | 60 | 44 |
| Overall | 100% | 11/100 | 46/100 | 31/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen MT PlusAlibaba (Qwen) | Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic | GPT-5 ChatOpenAI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | 166.7 | — |
| ECI rank | — | #5 of 165 | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 95.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | 88.8% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 100% | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | 46.5% | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $2.46 | $2.00 | $1.25 (best) |
| Output | $7.37 (best) | $10.00 | $10.00 |
| Cached input | — | $0.10 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.69 | $4.00 | $3.44 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Official Anthropic API | Median of 5 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 16,384 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 400,000 tokens |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 128,000 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes | No |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | qwen-mt-plus | claude-sonnet-5-5 | — |
| API providers | 3 | 34 (best) | 5 |
| Released | Jul 24, 2025 | Sep 28, 2026 | Aug 7, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Jun 2026 | Sep 30, 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen MT Plus$39.34
- Claude Sonnet 5.5$40.00
- GPT-5 Chat$32.50
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen MT Plus, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-5 Chat?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 46/100 against GPT-5 Chat (31) and Qwen MT Plus (11). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen MT Plus, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-5 Chat?
GPT-5 Chat is cheaper at $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). Qwen MT Plus costs $2.46 input / $7.37 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2.00 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.44 per million tokens for GPT-5 Chat versus $3.69 for Qwen MT Plus (1.1× as much) and $4.00 for Claude Sonnet 5.5 (1.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen MT Plus has not been scored yet, Claude Sonnet 5.5 has an ECI of 166.7 and GPT-5 Chat has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen MT Plus, Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-5 Chat yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Qwen MT Plus and GPT-5 Chat does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 400,000 for GPT-5 Chat and 16,384 for Qwen MT Plus. Maximum output per response: Qwen MT Plus up to 8,192, Claude Sonnet 5.5 up to 128,000, GPT-5 Chat up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen MT Plus accepts text; Claude Sonnet 5.5 accepts text, images and PDFs; GPT-5 Chat accepts text and images. Claude Sonnet 5.5 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Qwen MT Plus, Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-5 Chat are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the newest, released Sep 28, 2026. GPT-5 Chat came out Aug 7, 2025; Qwen MT Plus came out Jul 24, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Sonnet 5.5 Jun 2026, GPT-5 Chat Sep 30, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
