Qwen MT Plus vs Sarvam-M vs Solar Pro 2
Solar Pro 2 comes out ahead, 26 to 6 and 0 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen MT Plus
0/100- ECI—
- Price$2.46 / $7.37
- Context16K
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-M
6/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context33K
- Our pick
UpstageSolar Pro 2
26/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $0.25
- Context66K
Solar Pro 2 is our pick
Solar Pro 2 is the better all-round choice, scoring 26/100 against Sarvam-M (6) and Qwen MT Plus (0). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSolar Pro 2Solar Pro 2 $0.25 · Qwen MT Plus $3.69 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Sarvam-M unpriced
- Longest contextSolar Pro 2Solar Pro 2 65,536 · Sarvam-M 32,768 · Qwen MT Plus 16,384 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsQwen MT Plus: Text · Sarvam-M: Text · Solar Pro 2: Text
- Self-hostingSarvam-MPublishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Qwen MT Plus | Sarvam-M | Solar Pro 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 0 | 10 | 35 |
| Context window | 40% | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Overall | 100% | 0/100 | 6/100 | 26/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen MT PlusAlibaba (Qwen) | Sarvam-MSarvam AI | Solar Pro 2Upstage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $2.46 | — | $0.25 (best) |
| Output | $7.37 | — | $0.25 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.69 | — | $0.25 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | — | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | — | Official Upstage API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 16,384 tokens | 32,768 tokens | 65,536 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 32,768 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | Yesminimal · high |
| Tool calling | No | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenApache 2.0 | Proprietary |
| API model ID | qwen-mt-plus | — | solar-pro2 |
| API providers | 3 (best) | — | 2 |
| Released | Jul 24, 2025 | May 20, 2025 | May 20, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | Mar 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen MT Plus$39.34
- Sarvam-M—
- Solar Pro 2$3.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen MT Plus, Sarvam-M or Solar Pro 2?
Solar Pro 2 is the better all-round choice, scoring 26/100 against Sarvam-M (6) and Qwen MT Plus (0). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen MT Plus, Sarvam-M or Solar Pro 2?
Solar Pro 2 is cheaper at $0.25 input / $0.25 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). Qwen MT Plus costs $2.46 input / $7.37 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.25 per million tokens for Solar Pro 2 versus $3.69 for Qwen MT Plus (15× as much). Sarvam-M has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen MT Plus has not been scored yet, Sarvam-M has not been scored yet and Solar Pro 2 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen MT Plus, Sarvam-M and Solar Pro 2 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Qwen MT Plus and Sarvam-M does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Solar Pro 2 has the largest context window at 65,536 tokens, against 32,768 for Sarvam-M and 16,384 for Qwen MT Plus. Maximum output per response: Qwen MT Plus up to 8,192, Sarvam-M up to 32,768, Solar Pro 2 up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen MT Plus accepts text; Sarvam-M accepts text; Solar Pro 2 accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Sarvam-M publishes its weights (Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; Qwen MT Plus and Solar Pro 2 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen MT Plus is the newest, released Jul 24, 2025. Sarvam-M came out May 20, 2025; Solar Pro 2 came out May 20, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Solar Pro 2 Mar 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
