ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Qwen Max vs Sonar Reasoning Pro vs Step 1 (32K)

Sonar Reasoning Pro comes out ahead, 27 to 22 and 18 on our weighted score, though Qwen Max is 20% cheaper per token.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen Max

    Released Apr 3, 2024

    22/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.60 / $6.40
    • Context33K
  2. Our pick

    Perplexity

    Sonar Reasoning Pro

    Released Jan 1, 2024

    27/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $8.00
    • Context128K
  3. StepFun

    Step 1 (32K)

    Released Jan 1, 2025

    18/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.05 / $9.59
    • Context33K
01 — Verdict

Sonar Reasoning Pro is our pick

Sonar Reasoning Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 27/100 against Qwen Max (22) and Step 1 (32K) (18). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Qwen Max wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen MaxQwen Max $2.80 · Sonar Reasoning Pro $3.50 · Step 1 (32K) $3.94 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextSonar Reasoning ProSonar Reasoning Pro 128,000 · Qwen Max 32,768 · Step 1 (32K) 32,768 tokens
  • Widest inputsSonar Reasoning ProQwen Max: Text · Sonar Reasoning Pro: Text, Images · Step 1 (32K): Text
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen MaxSonar Reasoning ProStep 1 (32K)
Price50%292422
Inputs & features30%253525
Context window20%0240
Overall100%22/10027/10018/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen Max vs Sonar Reasoning Pro vs Step 1 (32K) specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen MaxAlibaba (Qwen)Sonar Reasoning ProPerplexityStep 1 (32K)StepFun
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$1.60 (best)$2.00$2.05
Output$6.40 (best)$8.00$9.59
Cached input——$0.41
Blended (3:1)$2.80 (best)$3.50$3.94
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Alibaba APIOfficial Perplexity APIOfficial StepFun (Global) API
Limits
Context window32,768 tokens128,000 tokens (best)32,768 tokens
Max output8,192 tokens4,096 tokens32,768 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoYesminimal · low · medium · highNo
Tool callingYesNoYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryProprietary
API model IDqwen-maxsonar-reasoning-prostep-1-32k
API providers6 (best)41
ReleasedApr 3, 2024Jan 1, 2024Jan 1, 2025
Knowledge cutoffApr 2024Sep 1, 2025Jun 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen Max$28.80
  • Sonar Reasoning Pro$36.00
  • Step 1 (32K)$39.68
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen Max, Sonar Reasoning Pro or Step 1 (32K)?

Sonar Reasoning Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 27/100 against Qwen Max (22) and Step 1 (32K) (18). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Qwen Max wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Qwen Max, Sonar Reasoning Pro or Step 1 (32K)?

Qwen Max is cheaper at $1.60 input / $6.40 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Sonar Reasoning Pro costs $2.00 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (official Perplexity API price); Step 1 (32K) costs $2.05 input / $9.59 output per million tokens (official StepFun (Global) API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.80 per million tokens for Qwen Max versus $3.50 for Sonar Reasoning Pro (1.3× as much) and $3.94 for Step 1 (32K) (1.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen Max has not been scored yet, Sonar Reasoning Pro has not been scored yet and Step 1 (32K) has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen Max, Sonar Reasoning Pro and Step 1 (32K) yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Sonar Reasoning Pro does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Sonar Reasoning Pro has the largest context window at 128,000 tokens, against 32,768 for Qwen Max and 32,768 for Step 1 (32K). Maximum output per response: Qwen Max up to 8,192, Sonar Reasoning Pro up to 4,096, Step 1 (32K) up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen Max accepts text; Sonar Reasoning Pro accepts text and images; Step 1 (32K) accepts text. Sonar Reasoning Pro handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Qwen Max, Sonar Reasoning Pro and Step 1 (32K) are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Step 1 (32K) is the newest, released Jan 1, 2025. Qwen Max came out Apr 3, 2024; Sonar Reasoning Pro came out Jan 1, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen Max Apr 2024, Sonar Reasoning Pro Sep 1, 2025, Step 1 (32K) Jun 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.