Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Magistral Medium
Pixtral Large (25.02) comes out ahead, 33 to 30 on our weighted score, though Magistral Medium is 8% cheaper per token.
- Our pick
Mistral AIPixtral Large (25.02)
33/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context128K
- Mistral AI
Magistral Medium
30/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $5.00
- Context128K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Pixtral Large (25.02) is our pick
Pixtral Large (25.02) is the better all-round choice, scoring 33/100 against Magistral Medium (30). It leads on inputs & features. Magistral Medium wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMagistral MediumMagistral Medium $2.75 · Pixtral Large (25.02) $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the samePixtral Large (25.02) 128,000 · Magistral Medium 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsPixtral Large (25.02)Pixtral Large (25.02): Text, Images · Magistral Medium: Text
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Pixtral Large (25.02) | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 27 | 29 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 50 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 33/100 | 30/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Pixtral Large (25.02)Mistral AI | Magistral MediumMistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Output | $6.00 | $5.00 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.00 | $2.75 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 3 providers | Official Mistral API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 16,384 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | magistral-medium-latest |
| API providers | 3 | 4 (best) |
| Released | Apr 8, 2025 | Mar 17, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Jun 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Pixtral Large (25.02)$32.00
- Magistral Medium$30.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Pixtral Large (25.02) or Magistral Medium?
Pixtral Large (25.02) is the better all-round choice, scoring 33/100 against Magistral Medium (30). It leads on inputs & features. Magistral Medium wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Pixtral Large (25.02) or Magistral Medium?
Magistral Medium is cheaper at $2.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Pixtral Large (25.02) costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.75 per million tokens for Magistral Medium versus $3.00 for Pixtral Large (25.02) (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Pixtral Large (25.02) has not been scored yet and Magistral Medium has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Pixtral Large (25.02) and Magistral Medium yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Pixtral Large (25.02) and Magistral Medium share the same 128,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: Pixtral Large (25.02) up to 8,192, Magistral Medium up to 16,384 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Pixtral Large (25.02) accepts text and images; Magistral Medium accepts text. Pixtral Large (25.02) handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Pixtral Large (25.02) and Magistral Medium are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Pixtral Large (25.02) is the newest, released Apr 8, 2025. Magistral Medium came out Mar 17, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Magistral Medium Jun 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructThree-way comparison
- Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
- Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Sonar Deep ResearchPerplexity
- Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Jamba LargeAI21 Labs
- Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Command ACohere
- Magistral Medium vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
- Magistral Medium vs Sonar Deep ResearchPerplexity
