ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Magistral Medium vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Pixtral Large (25.02) comes out ahead, 33 to 30 and 28 on our weighted score, though Magistral Medium is 8% cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    Mistral AI

    Pixtral Large (25.02)

    Released Apr 8, 2025

    33/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context128K
  2. Mistral AI

    Magistral Medium

    Released Mar 17, 2025

    30/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $5.00
    • Context128K
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

    Released Apr 2025

    28/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.50 / $7.50
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Pixtral Large (25.02) is our pick

Pixtral Large (25.02) is the better all-round choice, scoring 33/100 against Magistral Medium (30) and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (28). It leads on inputs & features. Magistral Medium wins on price. Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceMagistral MediumMagistral Medium $2.75 · Pixtral Large (25.02) $3.00 · Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 262,144 · Pixtral Large (25.02) 128,000 · Magistral Medium 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsPixtral Large (25.02)Pixtral Large (25.02): Text, Images · Magistral Medium: Text · Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: Text
  • Self-hostingQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightPixtral Large (25.02)Magistral MediumQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Price50%272927
Inputs & features30%503525
Context window20%242437
Overall100%33/10030/10028/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Magistral Medium vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationPixtral Large (25.02)Mistral AIMagistral MediumMistral AIQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$2.00$2.00$1.50 (best)
Output$6.00$5.00 (best)$7.50
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$3.00$2.75 (best)$3.00
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateOver 32K: $2.70 / $13.50
Price sourceMedian of 3 providersOfficial Mistral APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens128,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Max output8,192 tokens16,384 tokens65,536 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoYesNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryOpen
API model ID—magistral-medium-latestqwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct
API providers347 (best)
ReleasedApr 8, 2025Mar 17, 2025Apr 2025
Knowledge cutoff—Jun 2025Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Pixtral Large (25.02)$32.00
  • Magistral Medium$30.00
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct$30.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Pixtral Large (25.02), Magistral Medium or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Pixtral Large (25.02) is the better all-round choice, scoring 33/100 against Magistral Medium (30) and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (28). It leads on inputs & features. Magistral Medium wins on price. Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Pixtral Large (25.02), Magistral Medium or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Magistral Medium is cheaper at $2.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Pixtral Large (25.02) costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers); Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct costs $1.50 input / $7.50 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.75 per million tokens for Magistral Medium versus $3.00 for Pixtral Large (25.02) (1.1× as much) and $3.00 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (1.1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Pixtral Large (25.02) has not been scored yet, Magistral Medium has not been scored yet and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Pixtral Large (25.02), Magistral Medium and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 128,000 for Pixtral Large (25.02) and 128,000 for Magistral Medium. Maximum output per response: Pixtral Large (25.02) up to 8,192, Magistral Medium up to 16,384, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Pixtral Large (25.02) accepts text and images; Magistral Medium accepts text; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct accepts text. Pixtral Large (25.02) handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Pixtral Large (25.02) and Magistral Medium is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Pixtral Large (25.02) is the newest, released Apr 8, 2025. Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct came out Apr 2025; Magistral Medium came out Mar 17, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Magistral Medium Jun 2025, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.