Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Hermes 4 405B
Too close to call on our weighted score (Hermes 4 405B 35, Pixtral Large (25.02) 33). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Mistral AIPixtral Large (25.02)
33/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context128K
Nous ResearchHermes 4 405B
35/100- ECI—
- Price$1.00 / $3.00
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Hermes 4 405B 35/100, Pixtral Large (25.02) 33/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Hermes 4 405B on price and Hermes 4 405B for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceHermes 4 405BHermes 4 405B $1.50 · Pixtral Large (25.02) $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextHermes 4 405BHermes 4 405B 131,072 · Pixtral Large (25.02) 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsPixtral Large (25.02)Pixtral Large (25.02): Text, Images · Hermes 4 405B: Text
- Self-hostingHermes 4 405BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Pixtral Large (25.02) | Hermes 4 405B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 26 | 40 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 50 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 25 |
| Overall | 100% | 33/100 | 35/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Pixtral Large (25.02)Mistral AI | Hermes 4 405BNous Research |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00 | $1.00 (best) |
| Output | $6.00 | $3.00 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.00 | $1.50 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 3 providers | Median of 5 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 117,964 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 3 | 5 (best) |
| Released | Apr 8, 2025 | Aug 26, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Aug 31, 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Pixtral Large (25.02)$32.00
- Hermes 4 405B$16.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Pixtral Large (25.02) or Hermes 4 405B?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Hermes 4 405B 35/100, Pixtral Large (25.02) 33/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Hermes 4 405B on price and Hermes 4 405B for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Pixtral Large (25.02) or Hermes 4 405B?
Hermes 4 405B is cheaper at $1.00 input / $3.00 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). Pixtral Large (25.02) costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.50 per million tokens for Hermes 4 405B versus $3.00 for Pixtral Large (25.02) (2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Pixtral Large (25.02) has not been scored yet and Hermes 4 405B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Pixtral Large (25.02) and Hermes 4 405B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Hermes 4 405B has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Pixtral Large (25.02). Maximum output per response: Pixtral Large (25.02) up to 8,192, Hermes 4 405B up to 117,964 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Pixtral Large (25.02) accepts text and images; Hermes 4 405B accepts text. Pixtral Large (25.02) handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Hermes 4 405B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Pixtral Large (25.02) is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Hermes 4 405B is the newest, released Aug 26, 2025. Pixtral Large (25.02) came out Apr 8, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Hermes 4 405B Aug 31, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Three-way comparison
- Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Google
- Pixtral Large (25.02) vs o4-mini-deep-researchOpenAI
- Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Jamba LargeAI21 Labs
- Pixtral Large (25.02) vs Command ACohere
- Hermes 4 405B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingAlibaba (Qwen)
- Hermes 4 405B vs Apertus 70BSwiss AI
