ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct vs Trinity Mini vs Command R7B Arabic

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct comes out ahead, 72 to 65 and 65 on our weighted score, though Command R7B Arabic is 18% cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    Microsoft

    Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

    Released Feb 26, 2025

    72/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.07 / $0.11
    • Context131K
  2. Arcee AI

    Trinity Mini

    Released Dec 1, 2025

    65/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.045 / $0.15
    • Context131K
  3. Cohere

    Command R7B Arabic

    Released Feb 27, 2025

    65/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.037 / $0.15
    • Context128K
01 — Verdict

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is our pick

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against Trinity Mini (65) and Command R7B Arabic (65). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceCommand R7B ArabicCommand R7B Arabic $0.066 · Trinity Mini $0.071 · Phi-4-multimodal-instruct $0.08 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextPhi-4-multimodal-instruct and Trinity MiniPhi-4-multimodal-instruct 131,072 · Trinity Mini 131,072 · Command R7B Arabic 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsPhi-4-multimodal-instructPhi-4-multimodal-instruct: Text, Images, Audio · Trinity Mini: Text · Command R7B Arabic: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightPhi-4-multimodal-instructTrinity MiniCommand R7B Arabic
Price50%98100100
Inputs & features30%603535
Context window20%252524
Overall100%72/10065/10065/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct vs Trinity Mini vs Command R7B Arabic specifications side by side
SpecificationPhi-4-multimodal-instructMicrosoftTrinity MiniArcee AICommand R7B ArabicCohere
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.07$0.045$0.037 (best)
Output$0.11 (best)$0.15$0.15
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.08$0.071$0.066 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersMedian of 1 providersOfficial Cohere API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens (best)131,072 tokens (best)128,000 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens (best)131,072 tokens (best)4,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioYesNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoYesNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenMITOpenOpenMDW-1.1Open
API model ID——command-r7b-arabic-02-2025
API providers111
ReleasedFeb 26, 2025Dec 1, 2025Feb 27, 2025
Knowledge cutoffJun 2024—Jun 1, 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Phi-4-multimodal-instruct$0.92
  • Trinity Mini$0.75
  • Command R7B Arabic$0.675
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Phi-4-multimodal-instruct, Trinity Mini or Command R7B Arabic?

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against Trinity Mini (65) and Command R7B Arabic (65). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Phi-4-multimodal-instruct, Trinity Mini or Command R7B Arabic?

Command R7B Arabic is cheaper at $0.037 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). Trinity Mini costs $0.045 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); Phi-4-multimodal-instruct costs $0.07 input / $0.11 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.066 per million tokens for Command R7B Arabic versus $0.071 for Trinity Mini (1.1× as much) and $0.08 for Phi-4-multimodal-instruct (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Phi-4-multimodal-instruct has not been scored yet, Trinity Mini has not been scored yet and Command R7B Arabic has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Phi-4-multimodal-instruct, Trinity Mini and Command R7B Arabic yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct and Trinity Mini have the largest context windows (131,072 and 131,072 tokens), against 128,000 for Command R7B Arabic. Maximum output per response: Phi-4-multimodal-instruct up to 131,072, Trinity Mini up to 131,072, Command R7B Arabic up to 4,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct accepts text, images and audio; Trinity Mini accepts text; Command R7B Arabic accepts text. Phi-4-multimodal-instruct handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (MIT and OpenMDW-1.1), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Trinity Mini is the newest, released Dec 1, 2025. Command R7B Arabic came out Feb 27, 2025; Phi-4-multimodal-instruct came out Feb 26, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Phi-4-multimodal-instruct Jun 2024, Command R7B Arabic Jun 1, 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.