ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Palmyra X5 vs Morph V3 Fast vs Pixtral Large (25.02)

Palmyra X5 comes out ahead, 47 to 33 and 32 on our weighted score, though Morph V3 Fast is 2.2× cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    Writer

    Palmyra X5

    Released Apr 28, 2025

    47/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.60 / $6.00
    • Context1M
  2. Morph

    Morph V3 Fast

    Released Jul 7, 2025

    32/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.80 / $1.20
    • Context262K
  3. Mistral AI

    Pixtral Large (25.02)

    Released Apr 8, 2025

    33/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context128K
01 — Verdict

Palmyra X5 is our pick

Palmyra X5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 47/100 against Pixtral Large (25.02) (33) and Morph V3 Fast (32). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Morph V3 Fast wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceMorph V3 FastMorph V3 Fast $0.90 · Palmyra X5 $1.95 · Pixtral Large (25.02) $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextPalmyra X5Palmyra X5 1,000,000 · Morph V3 Fast 262,144 · Pixtral Large (25.02) 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsPalmyra X5 and Pixtral Large (25.02)Palmyra X5: Text, Images · Morph V3 Fast: Text · Pixtral Large (25.02): Text, Images
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightPalmyra X5Morph V3 FastPixtral Large (25.02)
Price50%355026
Inputs & features30%60050
Context window20%603724
Overall100%47/10032/10033/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Palmyra X5 vs Morph V3 Fast vs Pixtral Large (25.02) specifications side by side
SpecificationPalmyra X5WriterMorph V3 FastMorphPixtral Large (25.02)Mistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.60 (best)$0.80$2.00
Output$6.00$1.20 (best)$6.00
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$1.95$0.90 (best)$3.00
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 4 providersMedian of 5 providersMedian of 3 providers
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens (best)262,144 tokens128,000 tokens
Max output8,192 tokens131,072 tokens (best)8,192 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesNoNo
Tool callingYesNoYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryProprietary
API model ID———
API providers45 (best)3
ReleasedApr 28, 2025Jul 7, 2025Apr 8, 2025
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Palmyra X5$18.00
  • Morph V3 Fast$10.40
  • Pixtral Large (25.02)$32.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Palmyra X5, Morph V3 Fast or Pixtral Large (25.02)?

Palmyra X5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 47/100 against Pixtral Large (25.02) (33) and Morph V3 Fast (32). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Morph V3 Fast wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Palmyra X5, Morph V3 Fast or Pixtral Large (25.02)?

Morph V3 Fast is cheaper at $0.80 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). Palmyra X5 costs $0.60 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers); Pixtral Large (25.02) costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.90 per million tokens for Morph V3 Fast versus $1.95 for Palmyra X5 (2.2× as much) and $3.00 for Pixtral Large (25.02) (3.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Palmyra X5 has not been scored yet, Morph V3 Fast has not been scored yet and Pixtral Large (25.02) has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Palmyra X5, Morph V3 Fast and Pixtral Large (25.02) yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Morph V3 Fast does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Palmyra X5 has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Morph V3 Fast and 128,000 for Pixtral Large (25.02). Maximum output per response: Palmyra X5 up to 8,192, Morph V3 Fast up to 131,072, Pixtral Large (25.02) up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Palmyra X5 accepts text and images; Morph V3 Fast accepts text; Pixtral Large (25.02) accepts text and images. Palmyra X5 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Palmyra X5, Morph V3 Fast and Pixtral Large (25.02) are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Morph V3 Fast is the newest, released Jul 7, 2025. Palmyra X5 came out Apr 28, 2025; Pixtral Large (25.02) came out Apr 8, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.