Ornith 1.5 35B A3B vs Solar Mini 4 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash comes out ahead, 80 to 66 and 64 on our weighted score.
DeepReinforce
Ornith 1.5 35B A3B
66/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.40
- Context262K
UpstageSolar Mini 4
64/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.40
- Context524K
- Our pick
XiaomiMiMo-V2.6-Flash
80/100- ECI—
- Price$0.14 / $0.28
- Context1.05M
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is our pick
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 80/100 against Ornith 1.5 35B A3B (66) and Solar Mini 4 (64). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSame priceOrnith 1.5 35B A3B $0.175 · Solar Mini 4 $0.175 · MiMo-V2.6-Flash $0.175 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiMo-V2.6-FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash 1,048,576 · Solar Mini 4 524,288 · Ornith 1.5 35B A3B 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsMiMo-V2.6-FlashOrnith 1.5 35B A3B: Text, Images · Solar Mini 4: Text · MiMo-V2.6-Flash: Text, Images, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingOrnith 1.5 35B A3B and MiMo-V2.6-FlashPublishes downloadable weights (MIT)
| Measure | Weight | Ornith 1.5 35B A3B | Solar Mini 4 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 82 | 82 | 82 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 60 | 45 | 90 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 49 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 66/100 | 64/100 | 80/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Ornith 1.5 35B A3BDeepReinforce | Solar Mini 4Upstage | MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.10 (best) | $0.10 (best) | $0.14 |
| Output | $0.40 | $0.40 | $0.28 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.01 | $0.0028 (best) |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.175 | $0.175 | $0.175 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Official Upstage API | Official Xiaomi API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 524,288 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) |
| Max output | — | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | Yes |
| Video | No | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenMIT | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | — | solar-mini4 | mimo-v2.6-flash |
| API providers | 1 | 4 | 23 (best) |
| Released | Aug 18, 2026 | Sep 22, 2026 | Sep 22, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Feb 2026 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Ornith 1.5 35B A3B$1.80
- Solar Mini 4$1.80
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash$1.96
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Ornith 1.5 35B A3B, Solar Mini 4 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 80/100 against Ornith 1.5 35B A3B (66) and Solar Mini 4 (64). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Ornith 1.5 35B A3B, Solar Mini 4 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
Ornith 1.5 35B A3B, Solar Mini 4 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash cost the same: $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Ornith 1.5 35B A3B has not been scored yet, Solar Mini 4 has not been scored yet and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Ornith 1.5 35B A3B, Solar Mini 4 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 524,288 for Solar Mini 4 and 262,144 for Ornith 1.5 35B A3B. Maximum output per response: Solar Mini 4 up to 131,072, MiMo-V2.6-Flash up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Ornith 1.5 35B A3B accepts text and images; Solar Mini 4 accepts text; MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts text, images, audio and video. MiMo-V2.6-Flash handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Ornith 1.5 35B A3B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash publishes its weights (MIT) and can be self-hosted; Solar Mini 4 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Solar Mini 4 is the newest, released Sep 22, 2026. MiMo-V2.6-Flash came out Sep 22, 2026; Ornith 1.5 35B A3B came out Aug 18, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Solar Mini 4 Feb 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
