Ornith 1.0 31B vs Solar Pro 4
Ornith 1.0 31B comes out ahead, 51 to 46 on our weighted score.
- Our pick
DeepReinforce
Ornith 1.0 31B
51/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context262K
Upstage
Solar Pro 4
46/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $1.20
- Context524K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Ornith 1.0 31B is our pick
Ornith 1.0 31B is the better all-round choice, scoring 51/100 against Solar Pro 4 (46). It leads on inputs & features. Solar Pro 4 wins on context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSolar Pro 4Solar Pro 4 $0.525 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Ornith 1.0 31B unpriced
- Longest contextSolar Pro 4Solar Pro 4 524,288 · Ornith 1.0 31B 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsOrnith 1.0 31BOrnith 1.0 31B: Text, Images · Solar Pro 4: Text
- Self-hostingOrnith 1.0 31BPublishes downloadable weights (MIT)
| Measure | Weight | Ornith 1.0 31B | Solar Pro 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 60 | 45 |
| Context window | 40% | 37 | 49 |
| Overall | 100% | 51/100 | 46/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Ornith 1.0 31BDeepReinforce | Solar Pro 4Upstage |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | — | $0.30 |
| Output | — | $1.20 |
| Cached input | — | $0.06 |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.525 |
| Long-context rate | — | Same rate |
| Price source | — | Official Upstage API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 524,288 tokens (best) |
| Max output | — | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | OpenMIT | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | solar-pro4 |
| API providers | — | 3 |
| Released | Jun 25, 2026 | Aug 6, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Feb 2026 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Ornith 1.0 31B—
- Solar Pro 4$5.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Ornith 1.0 31B or Solar Pro 4?
Ornith 1.0 31B is the better all-round choice, scoring 51/100 against Solar Pro 4 (46). It leads on inputs & features. Solar Pro 4 wins on context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Ornith 1.0 31B or Solar Pro 4?
Solar Pro 4 is cheaper at $0.30 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). . At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.525 per million tokens for Solar Pro 4 versus . Ornith 1.0 31B has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Ornith 1.0 31B has not been scored yet and Solar Pro 4 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Ornith 1.0 31B and Solar Pro 4 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Solar Pro 4 has the largest context window at 524,288 tokens, against 262,144 for Ornith 1.0 31B. Maximum output per response: Solar Pro 4 up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Ornith 1.0 31B accepts text and images; Solar Pro 4 accepts text. Ornith 1.0 31B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Ornith 1.0 31B publishes its weights (MIT) and can be self-hosted; Solar Pro 4 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Solar Pro 4 is the newest, released Aug 6, 2026. Ornith 1.0 31B came out Jun 25, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Solar Pro 4 Feb 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
