o4-mini-deep-research vs Kimi K2 Instruct 0905
Too close to call on our weighted score (Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 38, o4-mini-deep-research 37). The right pick depends on what you value most.
OpenAIo4-mini-deep-research
37/100- ECI—
- Price$1.80 / $7.20
- Context200K
Moonshot AIKimi K2 Instruct 0905
38/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $2.50
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 38/100, o4-mini-deep-research 37/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 on price and Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceKimi K2 Instruct 0905Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 $1.07 · o4-mini-deep-research $3.15 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextKimi K2 Instruct 0905Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 262,144 · o4-mini-deep-research 200,000 tokens
- Widest inputso4-mini-deep-researcho4-mini-deep-research: Text, Images · Kimi K2 Instruct 0905: Text
- Self-hostingKimi K2 Instruct 0905Publishes downloadable weights (Modified MIT)
| Measure | Weight | o4-mini-deep-research | Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 25 | 46 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 60 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 32 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 37/100 | 38/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | o4-mini-deep-researchOpenAI | Kimi K2 Instruct 0905Moonshot AI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $1.80 | $0.60 (best) |
| Output | $7.20 | $2.50 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.15 | $1.07 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Median of 12 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 200,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 100,000 tokens (best) | 98,304 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenModified MIT |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 1 | 13 (best) |
| Released | Jun 26, 2025 | Sep 5, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | May 2024 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- o4-mini-deep-research$32.40
- Kimi K2 Instruct 0905$11.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: o4-mini-deep-research or Kimi K2 Instruct 0905?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 38/100, o4-mini-deep-research 37/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 on price and Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, o4-mini-deep-research or Kimi K2 Instruct 0905?
Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 is cheaper at $0.60 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (median across 12 API providers). o4-mini-deep-research costs $1.80 input / $7.20 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.07 per million tokens for Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 versus $3.15 for o4-mini-deep-research (2.9× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. o4-mini-deep-research has not been scored yet and Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for o4-mini-deep-research and Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 200,000 for o4-mini-deep-research. Maximum output per response: o4-mini-deep-research up to 100,000, Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 up to 98,304 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
o4-mini-deep-research accepts text and images; Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 accepts text. o4-mini-deep-research handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 publishes its weights (Modified MIT) and can be self-hosted; o4-mini-deep-research is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 is the newest, released Sep 5, 2025. o4-mini-deep-research came out Jun 26, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: o4-mini-deep-research May 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Jamba LargeThree-way comparison
- o4-mini-deep-research vs Jamba LargeAI21 Labs
- o4-mini-deep-research vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Google
- o4-mini-deep-research vs Qwen MT PlusAlibaba (Qwen)
- o4-mini-deep-research vs Pixtral Large (25.02)Mistral AI
- Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 vs Apertus 70BSwiss AI
- Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 vs GLM-4.6Z.ai (Zhipu)
