ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

o4-mini-deep-research vs Jamba Large vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 comes out ahead, 48 to 37 and 29 on our weighted score, though o4-mini-deep-research is 6% cheaper per token.

  1. OpenAI

    o4-mini-deep-research

    Released Jun 26, 2025

    37/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.80 / $7.20
    • Context200K
  2. AI21 Labs

    Jamba Large

    Released Jul 3, 2025

    29/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $8.00
    • Context256K
  3. Our pick

    Google

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

    Released Jun 5, 2025

    48/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.22 / $9.75
    • Context1.05M
01 — Verdict

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is our pick

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is the better all-round choice, scoring 48/100 against o4-mini-deep-research (37) and Jamba Large (29). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceo4-mini-deep-researcho4-mini-deep-research $3.15 · Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 $3.35 · Jamba Large $3.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 1,048,576 · Jamba Large 256,000 · o4-mini-deep-research 200,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05o4-mini-deep-research: Text, Images · Jamba Large: Text · Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio
  • Self-hostingJamba LargePublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeighto4-mini-deep-researchJamba LargeGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Price50%252324
Inputs & features30%603580
Context window20%323661
Overall100%37/10029/10048/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

o4-mini-deep-research vs Jamba Large vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 specifications side by side
Specificationo4-mini-deep-researchOpenAIJamba LargeAI21 LabsGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Google
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$1.80$2.00$1.22 (best)
Output$7.20 (best)$8.00$9.75
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$3.15 (best)$3.50$3.35
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersOfficial AI21 Labs APIMedian of 4 providers
Limits
Context window200,000 tokens256,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Max output100,000 tokens (best)4,096 tokens65,536 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoYes
PDFsNoNoYes
AudioNoNoYes
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesNoYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenProprietary
API model ID—jamba-large—
API providers114 (best)
ReleasedJun 26, 2025Jul 3, 2025Jun 5, 2025
Knowledge cutoffMay 2024Aug 22, 2024Jan 31, 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • o4-mini-deep-research$32.40
  • Jamba Large$36.00
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05$31.69
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: o4-mini-deep-research, Jamba Large or Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is the better all-round choice, scoring 48/100 against o4-mini-deep-research (37) and Jamba Large (29). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, o4-mini-deep-research, Jamba Large or Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05?

o4-mini-deep-research is cheaper at $1.80 input / $7.20 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 costs $1.22 input / $9.75 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers); Jamba Large costs $2.00 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (official AI21 Labs API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.15 per million tokens for o4-mini-deep-research versus $3.35 for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 (1.1× as much) and $3.50 for Jamba Large (1.1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. o4-mini-deep-research has not been scored yet, Jamba Large has not been scored yet and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for o4-mini-deep-research, Jamba Large and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 256,000 for Jamba Large and 200,000 for o4-mini-deep-research. Maximum output per response: o4-mini-deep-research up to 100,000, Jamba Large up to 4,096, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

o4-mini-deep-research accepts text and images; Jamba Large accepts text; Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 accepts text, images, PDFs and audio. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Jamba Large publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; o4-mini-deep-research and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Jamba Large is the newest, released Jul 3, 2025. o4-mini-deep-research came out Jun 26, 2025; Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 came out Jun 5, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: o4-mini-deep-research May 2024, Jamba Large Aug 22, 2024, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 Jan 31, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.