ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

o3-deep-research vs Morph V3 Fast vs Gemma 3n E2B IT

o3-deep-research comes out ahead, 49 to 21 and 15 on our weighted score, though Morph V3 Fast is 18× cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    OpenAI

    o3-deep-research

    Released Jun 26, 2025

    49/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$9.00 / $36.00
    • Context200K
  2. Morph

    Morph V3 Fast

    Released Jul 7, 2025

    15/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.80 / $1.20
    • Context262K
  3. Google

    Gemma 3n E2B IT

    Released Jun 26, 2025

    21/100
    • ECI—
    • Price—
    • Context33K
01 — Verdict

o3-deep-research is our pick

o3-deep-research is the better all-round choice, scoring 49/100 against Gemma 3n E2B IT (21) and Morph V3 Fast (15). It leads on inputs & features. Morph V3 Fast wins on context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceMorph V3 FastMorph V3 Fast $0.90 · o3-deep-research $15.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Gemma 3n E2B IT unpriced
  • Longest contextMorph V3 FastMorph V3 Fast 262,144 · o3-deep-research 200,000 · Gemma 3n E2B IT 32,768 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemma 3n E2B ITo3-deep-research: Text, Images · Morph V3 Fast: Text · Gemma 3n E2B IT: Text, Images, Audio
  • Self-hostingGemma 3n E2B ITPublishes downloadable weights (Gemma Terms of Use)
How the score is built
MeasureWeighto3-deep-researchMorph V3 FastGemma 3n E2B IT
Inputs & features60%60035
Context window40%32370
Overall100%49/10015/10021/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

o3-deep-research vs Morph V3 Fast vs Gemma 3n E2B IT specifications side by side
Specificationo3-deep-researchOpenAIMorph V3 FastMorphGemma 3n E2B ITGoogle
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$9.00$0.80 (best)—
Output$36.00$1.20 (best)—
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$15.75$0.90 (best)—
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate—
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersMedian of 5 providers—
Limits
Context window200,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)32,768 tokens
Max output100,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)32,768 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoYes
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesNoNo
Tool callingYesNoNo
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryOpenGemma Terms of Use
API model ID———
API providers15 (best)—
ReleasedJun 26, 2025Jul 7, 2025Jun 26, 2025
Knowledge cutoffMay 2024—Jun 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • o3-deep-research$162.00
  • Morph V3 Fast$10.40
  • Gemma 3n E2B IT—
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: o3-deep-research, Morph V3 Fast or Gemma 3n E2B IT?

o3-deep-research is the better all-round choice, scoring 49/100 against Gemma 3n E2B IT (21) and Morph V3 Fast (15). It leads on inputs & features. Morph V3 Fast wins on context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, o3-deep-research, Morph V3 Fast or Gemma 3n E2B IT?

Morph V3 Fast is cheaper at $0.80 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). o3-deep-research costs $9.00 input / $36.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.90 per million tokens for Morph V3 Fast versus $15.75 for o3-deep-research (18× as much). Gemma 3n E2B IT has no published per-token price.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. o3-deep-research has not been scored yet, Morph V3 Fast has not been scored yet and Gemma 3n E2B IT has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for o3-deep-research, Morph V3 Fast and Gemma 3n E2B IT yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Morph V3 Fast and Gemma 3n E2B IT does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Morph V3 Fast has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 200,000 for o3-deep-research and 32,768 for Gemma 3n E2B IT. Maximum output per response: o3-deep-research up to 100,000, Morph V3 Fast up to 131,072, Gemma 3n E2B IT up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

o3-deep-research accepts text and images; Morph V3 Fast accepts text; Gemma 3n E2B IT accepts text, images and audio. Gemma 3n E2B IT handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Gemma 3n E2B IT publishes its weights (Gemma Terms of Use) and can be self-hosted; o3-deep-research and Morph V3 Fast is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Morph V3 Fast is the newest, released Jul 7, 2025. o3-deep-research came out Jun 26, 2025; Gemma 3n E2B IT came out Jun 26, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: o3-deep-research May 2024, Gemma 3n E2B IT Jun 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.