ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

o3-deep-research vs GLM-4.5V vs Gemma 3n E2B IT

Too close to call on our weighted score (o3-deep-research 49, GLM-4.5V 47, Gemma 3n E2B IT 21). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. OpenAI

    o3-deep-research

    Released Jun 26, 2025

    49/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$9.00 / $36.00
    • Context200K
  2. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-4.5V

    Released Aug 11, 2025

    47/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.60 / $1.80
    • Context64K
  3. Google

    Gemma 3n E2B IT

    Released Jun 26, 2025

    21/100
    • ECI—
    • Price—
    • Context33K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (o3-deep-research 49/100, GLM-4.5V 47/100, Gemma 3n E2B IT 21/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GLM-4.5V on price and o3-deep-research for long inputs. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGLM-4.5VGLM-4.5V $0.90 · o3-deep-research $15.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Gemma 3n E2B IT unpriced
  • Longest contexto3-deep-researcho3-deep-research 200,000 · GLM-4.5V 64,000 · Gemma 3n E2B IT 32,768 tokens
  • Widest inputsGLM-4.5V and Gemma 3n E2B ITo3-deep-research: Text, Images · GLM-4.5V: Text, Images, Video · Gemma 3n E2B IT: Text, Images, Audio
  • Self-hostingGLM-4.5V and Gemma 3n E2B ITPublishes downloadable weights (Gemma Terms of Use)
How the score is built
MeasureWeighto3-deep-researchGLM-4.5VGemma 3n E2B IT
Inputs & features60%607035
Context window40%32120
Overall100%49/10047/10021/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

o3-deep-research vs GLM-4.5V vs Gemma 3n E2B IT specifications side by side
Specificationo3-deep-researchOpenAIGLM-4.5VZ.ai (Zhipu)Gemma 3n E2B ITGoogle
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$9.00$0.60 (best)—
Output$36.00$1.80 (best)—
Cached input—$0.11—
Blended (3:1)$15.75$0.90 (best)—
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate—
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersOfficial Z.AI API—
Limits
Context window200,000 tokens (best)64,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Max output100,000 tokens (best)16,384 tokens32,768 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoYes
VideoNoYesNo
ReasoningYesYesNo
Tool callingYesYesNo
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenOpenGemma Terms of Use
API model ID—glm-4.5v—
API providers117 (best)—
ReleasedJun 26, 2025Aug 11, 2025Jun 26, 2025
Knowledge cutoffMay 2024Apr 2025Jun 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • o3-deep-research$162.00
  • GLM-4.5V$9.60
  • Gemma 3n E2B IT—
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: o3-deep-research, GLM-4.5V or Gemma 3n E2B IT?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (o3-deep-research 49/100, GLM-4.5V 47/100, Gemma 3n E2B IT 21/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GLM-4.5V on price and o3-deep-research for long inputs. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, o3-deep-research, GLM-4.5V or Gemma 3n E2B IT?

GLM-4.5V is cheaper at $0.60 input / $1.80 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). o3-deep-research costs $9.00 input / $36.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.90 per million tokens for GLM-4.5V versus $15.75 for o3-deep-research (18× as much). Gemma 3n E2B IT has no published per-token price.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. o3-deep-research has not been scored yet, GLM-4.5V has not been scored yet and Gemma 3n E2B IT has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for o3-deep-research, GLM-4.5V and Gemma 3n E2B IT yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Gemma 3n E2B IT does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

o3-deep-research has the largest context window at 200,000 tokens, against 64,000 for GLM-4.5V and 32,768 for Gemma 3n E2B IT. Maximum output per response: o3-deep-research up to 100,000, GLM-4.5V up to 16,384, Gemma 3n E2B IT up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

o3-deep-research accepts text and images; GLM-4.5V accepts text, images and video; Gemma 3n E2B IT accepts text, images and audio. GLM-4.5V handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

GLM-4.5V and Gemma 3n E2B IT publishes its weights (Gemma Terms of Use) and can be self-hosted; o3-deep-research is proprietary.

Which is newer?

GLM-4.5V is the newest, released Aug 11, 2025. o3-deep-research came out Jun 26, 2025; Gemma 3n E2B IT came out Jun 26, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: o3-deep-research May 2024, GLM-4.5V Apr 2025, Gemma 3n E2B IT Jun 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.