ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

o1 vs DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B

o1 comes out ahead, 65 to 47 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    OpenAI

    o1

    Released Dec 5, 2024Deprecated

    65/100
    • ECI141.9
    • Price$15.00 / $60.00
    • Context200K
  2. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B

    Released Jan 20, 2025

    47/100
    • ECI137.4
    • Price—
    • Context131K
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

o1 is our pick

o1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B (47). It leads on capability, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 67%, inputs & features 20%, context window 13%.

  • Capabilityo1Capabilities Index (ECI): o1 141.9 · DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B 137.4
  • Lowest priceo1o1 $26.25 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B unpriced
  • Longest contexto1o1 200,000 · DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputso1o1: Text, Images, PDFs · DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: Text
  • Self-hostingDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeighto1DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)67%6862
Inputs & features20%8010
Context window13%3224
Overall100%65/10047/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: price. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

o1 vs DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B specifications side by side
Specificationo1OpenAIDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BDeepSeek
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)141.9 (best)137.4
ECI rank#92 of 148 (best)#110 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions76.8% (best)64.1%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics14.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics73.3% (best)55.6%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions41.1%—
Price per million tokens
Input$15.00—
Output$60.00—
Cached input$7.50—
Blended (3:1)$26.25—
Long-context rateSame rate—
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI API—
Limits
Context window200,000 tokens (best)131,072 tokens
Max output100,000 tokens (best)32,768 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesNo
PDFsYesNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningYeslow · medium · highYes
Tool callingYesNo
Structured outputYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpen
API model IDo1—
API providers9—
ReleasedDec 5, 2024Jan 20, 2025
Knowledge cutoffSep 2023—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • o1$270.00
  • DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B—
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: o1 or DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B?

o1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B (47). It leads on capability, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 67%, inputs & features 20%, context window 13%.

Which is cheaper, o1 or DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B?

o1 is cheaper at $15.00 input / $60.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). . At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $26.25 per million tokens for o1 versus . DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B has no published per-token price.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

o1 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): o1 141.9 (#92 of 148) and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B 137.4 (#110 of 148). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (139.7–143.1 vs 130.7–138.7), so the gap is a real one. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — o1 76.8%, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B 64.1%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — o1 73.3%, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B 55.6%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for o1 and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, o1 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Note that DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

o1 has the largest context window at 200,000 tokens, against 131,072 for DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B. Maximum output per response: o1 up to 100,000, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

o1 accepts text, images and PDFs; DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B accepts text. o1 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; o1 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B is the newest, released Jan 20, 2025. o1 came out Dec 5, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: o1 Sep 2023.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.