Nova Micro vs Command R7B Arabic
Command R7B Arabic comes out ahead, 65 to 62 on our weighted score, though Nova Micro is 7% cheaper per token.
AmazonNova Micro
62/100- ECI—
- Price$0.035 / $0.14
- Context128K
- Our pick
CohereCommand R7B Arabic
65/100- ECI—
- Price$0.037 / $0.15
- Context128K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Command R7B Arabic is our pick
Command R7B Arabic is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Nova Micro (62). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceNova MicroNova Micro $0.061 · Command R7B Arabic $0.066 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameNova Micro 128,000 · Command R7B Arabic 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsNova Micro: Text · Command R7B Arabic: Text
- Self-hostingCommand R7B ArabicPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Nova Micro | Command R7B Arabic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 100 | 100 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 62/100 | 65/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Nova MicroAmazon | Command R7B ArabicCohere |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.035 (best) | $0.037 |
| Output | $0.14 (best) | $0.15 |
| Cached input | $0.0088 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.061 (best) | $0.066 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Amazon Bedrock API | Official Cohere API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 10,000 tokens (best) | 4,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | amazon.nova-micro-v1:0 | command-r7b-arabic-02-2025 |
| API providers | 8 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Dec 3, 2024 | Feb 27, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Oct 2024 | Jun 1, 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Nova Micro$0.63
- Command R7B Arabic$0.675
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Nova Micro or Command R7B Arabic?
Command R7B Arabic is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Nova Micro (62). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Nova Micro or Command R7B Arabic?
Nova Micro is cheaper at $0.035 input / $0.14 output per million tokens (official Amazon Bedrock API price). Command R7B Arabic costs $0.037 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.061 per million tokens for Nova Micro versus $0.066 for Command R7B Arabic (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Nova Micro has not been scored yet and Command R7B Arabic has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Nova Micro and Command R7B Arabic yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nova Micro and Command R7B Arabic share the same 128,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: Nova Micro up to 10,000, Command R7B Arabic up to 4,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Nova Micro accepts text; Command R7B Arabic accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Command R7B Arabic publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Nova Micro is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Command R7B Arabic is the newest, released Feb 27, 2025. Nova Micro came out Dec 3, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Nova Micro Oct 2024, Command R7B Arabic Jun 1, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
