ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Nex-N2-Pro vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs Seed 2.1 Turbo

Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 58, Seed 2.1 Turbo 57, Nex-N2-Pro 53). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Nex AGI

    Nex-N2-Pro

    Released Jun 2, 2026

    53/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.50 / $2.50
    • Context262K
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

    Released Feb 23, 2026

    58/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.40 / $3.20
    • Context262K
  3. ByteDance Seed

    Seed 2.1 Turbo

    Released Jun 23, 2026

    57/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.445 / $2.23
    • Context256K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 58/100, Seed 2.1 Turbo 57/100, Nex-N2-Pro 53/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Seed 2.1 Turbo on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceSeed 2.1 TurboSeed 2.1 Turbo $0.891 · Nex-N2-Pro $1.00 · Qwen3.5 122B-A10B $1.10 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextNex-N2-Pro and Qwen3.5 122B-A10BNex-N2-Pro 262,144 · Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 262,144 · Seed 2.1 Turbo 256,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3.5 122B-A10BNex-N2-Pro: Text, Images · Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: Text, Images, Audio, Video · Seed 2.1 Turbo: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingNex-N2-Pro and Qwen3.5 122B-A10BPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightNex-N2-ProQwen3.5 122B-A10BSeed 2.1 Turbo
Price50%504852
Inputs & features30%709080
Context window20%373736
Overall100%53/10058/10057/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Nex-N2-Pro vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs Seed 2.1 Turbo specifications side by side
SpecificationNex-N2-ProNex AGIQwen3.5 122B-A10BAlibaba (Qwen)Seed 2.1 TurboByteDance Seed
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.50$0.40 (best)$0.445
Output$2.50$3.20$2.23 (best)
Cached input——$0.089
Blended (3:1)$1.00$1.10$0.891 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersOfficial Alibaba APIOfficial Volcengine Ark API
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens (best)262,144 tokens (best)256,000 tokens
Max output262,144 tokens (best)65,536 tokens256,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoYesNo
VideoNoYesYes
ReasoningYesYesYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesYes
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenProprietary
API model ID—qwen3.5-122b-a10bdoubao-seed-2-1-turbo-260628
API providers119 (best)4
ReleasedJun 2, 2026Feb 23, 2026Jun 23, 2026
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Nex-N2-Pro$10.00
  • Qwen3.5 122B-A10B$10.40
  • Seed 2.1 Turbo$8.91
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Nex-N2-Pro, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or Seed 2.1 Turbo?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 58/100, Seed 2.1 Turbo 57/100, Nex-N2-Pro 53/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Seed 2.1 Turbo on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Nex-N2-Pro, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or Seed 2.1 Turbo?

Seed 2.1 Turbo is cheaper at $0.445 input / $2.23 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). Nex-N2-Pro costs $0.50 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); Qwen3.5 122B-A10B costs $0.40 input / $3.20 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.891 per million tokens for Seed 2.1 Turbo versus $1.00 for Nex-N2-Pro (1.1× as much) and $1.10 for Qwen3.5 122B-A10B (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Nex-N2-Pro has not been scored yet, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has not been scored yet and Seed 2.1 Turbo has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Nex-N2-Pro, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B and Seed 2.1 Turbo yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nex-N2-Pro and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B have the largest context windows (262,144 and 262,144 tokens), against 256,000 for Seed 2.1 Turbo. Maximum output per response: Nex-N2-Pro up to 262,144, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B up to 65,536, Seed 2.1 Turbo up to 256,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Nex-N2-Pro accepts text and images; Qwen3.5 122B-A10B accepts text, images, audio and video; Seed 2.1 Turbo accepts text, images and video. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Nex-N2-Pro and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.1 Turbo is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Seed 2.1 Turbo is the newest, released Jun 23, 2026. Nex-N2-Pro came out Jun 2, 2026; Qwen3.5 122B-A10B came out Feb 23, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.