Nex-N2-Pro vs MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed
Nex-N2-Pro comes out ahead, 53 to 41 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
Nex AGI
Nex-N2-Pro
53/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $2.50
- Context262K
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed
41/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $2.40
- Context205K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Nex-N2-Pro is our pick
Nex-N2-Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 53/100 against MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed (41). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceNex-N2-ProNex-N2-Pro $1.00 · MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed $1.05 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextNex-N2-ProNex-N2-Pro 262,144 · MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed 204,800 tokens
- Widest inputsNex-N2-ProNex-N2-Pro: Text, Images · MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Nex-N2-Pro | MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 50 | 49 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 70 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 53/100 | 41/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Nex-N2-ProNex AGI | MiniMax-M2.7-highspeedMiniMax |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.50 (best) | $0.60 |
| Output | $2.50 | $2.40 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.06 |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.00 (best) | $1.05 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Official MiniMax (minimax.io) API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens (best) | 204,800 tokens |
| Max output | 262,144 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Open |
| API model ID | — | MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed |
| API providers | 1 | 14 (best) |
| Released | Jun 2, 2026 | Mar 18, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Nex-N2-Pro$10.00
- MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed$10.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Nex-N2-Pro or MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed?
Nex-N2-Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 53/100 against MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed (41). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Nex-N2-Pro or MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed?
Nex-N2-Pro is cheaper at $0.50 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed costs $0.60 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.00 per million tokens for Nex-N2-Pro versus $1.05 for MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Nex-N2-Pro has not been scored yet and MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Nex-N2-Pro and MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nex-N2-Pro has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 204,800 for MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed. Maximum output per response: Nex-N2-Pro up to 262,144, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Nex-N2-Pro accepts text and images; MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed accepts text. Nex-N2-Pro handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Nex-N2-Pro is the newest, released Jun 2, 2026. MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed came out Mar 18, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Seed 2.1 TurboThree-way comparison
- Nex-N2-Pro vs Seed 2.1 TurboByteDance Seed
- Nex-N2-Pro vs Motif 3Motif Technologies
- Nex-N2-Pro vs LongCat-2.0Meituan (LongCat)
- MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10BAlibaba (Qwen)
- MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs DeepSeek OCR 2DeepSeek
- MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs Seed 2.0 CodeByteDance Seed
