ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct vs Hermes 3 70B Instruct vs Command R

Command R comes out ahead, 31 to 25 and 10 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. NVIDIA

    Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct

    Released Aug 21, 2024

    25/100
    • ECI—
    • Price—
    • Context128K
  2. Nous Research

    Hermes 3 70B Instruct

    Released Aug 18, 2024

    10/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.70 / $0.70
    • Context131K
  3. Our pick

    Cohere

    Command R

    Released Aug 30, 2024

    31/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.60
    • Context128K
01 — Verdict

Command R is our pick

Command R is the better all-round choice, scoring 31/100 against Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct (25) and Hermes 3 70B Instruct (10). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceCommand RCommand R $0.263 · Hermes 3 70B Instruct $0.70 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct unpriced
  • Longest contextHermes 3 70B InstructHermes 3 70B Instruct 131,072 · Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct 128,000 · Command R 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsNemotron Mini 4B Instruct: Text · Hermes 3 70B Instruct: Text · Command R: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightNemotron Mini 4B InstructHermes 3 70B InstructCommand R
Inputs & features60%25035
Context window40%242524
Overall100%25/10010/10031/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct vs Hermes 3 70B Instruct vs Command R specifications side by side
SpecificationNemotron Mini 4B InstructNVIDIAHermes 3 70B InstructNous ResearchCommand RCohere
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input—$0.70$0.15 (best)
Output—$0.70$0.60 (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)—$0.70$0.263 (best)
Long-context rate—Same rateSame rate
Price source—Median of 5 providersOfficial Cohere API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)128,000 tokens
Max output8,192 tokens16,384 tokens (best)4,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesNoYes
Structured outputNoNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenOpen
API model ID——command-r-08-2024
API providers—56 (best)
ReleasedAug 21, 2024Aug 18, 2024Aug 30, 2024
Knowledge cutoff—Dec 31, 2023Jun 1, 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct—
  • Hermes 3 70B Instruct$8.40
  • Command R$2.70
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct, Hermes 3 70B Instruct or Command R?

Command R is the better all-round choice, scoring 31/100 against Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct (25) and Hermes 3 70B Instruct (10). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct, Hermes 3 70B Instruct or Command R?

Command R is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). Hermes 3 70B Instruct costs $0.70 input / $0.70 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.263 per million tokens for Command R versus $0.70 for Hermes 3 70B Instruct (2.7× as much). Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct has no published per-token price.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct has not been scored yet, Hermes 3 70B Instruct has not been scored yet and Command R has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct, Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Command R yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Hermes 3 70B Instruct does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hermes 3 70B Instruct has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct and 128,000 for Command R. Maximum output per response: Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct up to 8,192, Hermes 3 70B Instruct up to 16,384, Command R up to 4,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct accepts text; Hermes 3 70B Instruct accepts text; Command R accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights, so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Command R is the newest, released Aug 30, 2024. Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct came out Aug 21, 2024; Hermes 3 70B Instruct came out Aug 18, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Hermes 3 70B Instruct Dec 31, 2023, Command R Jun 1, 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.