Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Sarvam-M vs Solar Pro 2
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B comes out ahead, 36 to 26 and 6 on our weighted score, though Solar Pro 2 is 9% cheaper per token.
- Our pick
NVIDIANemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
36/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.65
- Context262K
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-M
6/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context33K
UpstageSolar Pro 2
26/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $0.25
- Context66K
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B is our pick
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B is the better all-round choice, scoring 36/100 against Solar Pro 2 (26) and Sarvam-M (6). It leads on context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSolar Pro 2Solar Pro 2 $0.25 · Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B $0.275 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Sarvam-M unpriced
- Longest contextNemotron 3 Super 120B A12BNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B 262,144 · Solar Pro 2 65,536 · Sarvam-M 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B: Text · Sarvam-M: Text · Solar Pro 2: Text
- Self-hostingNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B and Sarvam-MPublishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B | Sarvam-M | Solar Pro 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 35 | 10 | 35 |
| Context window | 40% | 37 | 0 | 12 |
| Overall | 100% | 36/100 | 6/100 | 26/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12BNVIDIA | Sarvam-MSarvam AI | Solar Pro 2Upstage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.15 (best) | — | $0.25 |
| Output | $0.65 | — | $0.25 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.275 | — | $0.25 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | — | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 16 providers | — | Official Upstage API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Max output | 262,144 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Yesminimal · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | OpenApache 2.0 | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | — | solar-pro2 |
| API providers | 18 (best) | — | 2 |
| Released | Mar 11, 2026 | May 20, 2025 | May 20, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 2025 | — | Mar 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B$2.80
- Sarvam-M—
- Solar Pro 2$3.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B, Sarvam-M or Solar Pro 2?
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B is the better all-round choice, scoring 36/100 against Solar Pro 2 (26) and Sarvam-M (6). It leads on context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B, Sarvam-M or Solar Pro 2?
Solar Pro 2 is cheaper at $0.25 input / $0.25 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B costs $0.15 input / $0.65 output per million tokens (median across 16 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.25 per million tokens for Solar Pro 2 versus $0.275 for Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (1.1× as much). Sarvam-M has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B has not been scored yet, Sarvam-M has not been scored yet and Solar Pro 2 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B, Sarvam-M and Solar Pro 2 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Sarvam-M does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 65,536 for Solar Pro 2 and 32,768 for Sarvam-M. Maximum output per response: Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B up to 262,144, Sarvam-M up to 32,768, Solar Pro 2 up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B accepts text; Sarvam-M accepts text; Solar Pro 2 accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B and Sarvam-M publishes its weights (Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; Solar Pro 2 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B is the newest, released Mar 11, 2026. Sarvam-M came out May 20, 2025; Solar Pro 2 came out May 20, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B Jun 2025, Solar Pro 2 Mar 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
