ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs GLM-4.6V-Flash

GLM-4.6V-Flash comes out ahead, 63 to 54 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. NVIDIA

    Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B

    Released Mar 11, 2026

    54/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.65
    • Context262K
    Full specs Remove Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
  2. Our pick

    Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-4.6V-Flash

    Released Dec 8, 2025

    63/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.161 / $0.559
    • Context128K
    Full specs Remove GLM-4.6V-Flash

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

GLM-4.6V-Flash is our pick

GLM-4.6V-Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (54). It leads on inputs & features. Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGLM-4.6V-FlashGLM-4.6V-Flash $0.261 · Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B $0.275 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextNemotron 3 Super 120B A12BNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B 262,144 · GLM-4.6V-Flash 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGLM-4.6V-FlashNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B: Text · GLM-4.6V-Flash: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightNemotron 3 Super 120B A12BGLM-4.6V-Flash
Price50%7374
Inputs & features30%3570
Context window20%3724
Overall100%54/10063/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs GLM-4.6V-Flash specifications side by side
SpecificationNemotron 3 Super 120B A12BNVIDIAGLM-4.6V-FlashZ.ai (Zhipu)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.15 (best)$0.161
Output$0.65$0.559 (best)
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$0.275$0.261 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 16 providersMedian of 2 providers
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens (best)128,000 tokens
Max output262,144 tokens (best)32,768 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesNoYes
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpen
API model ID—glm-4.6v-flash
API providers18 (best)6
ReleasedMar 11, 2026Dec 8, 2025
Knowledge cutoffJun 2025—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B$2.80
  • GLM-4.6V-Flash$2.73
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B or GLM-4.6V-Flash?

GLM-4.6V-Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (54). It leads on inputs & features. Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B or GLM-4.6V-Flash?

GLM-4.6V-Flash is cheaper at $0.161 input / $0.559 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers; free on Z.AI). Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B costs $0.15 input / $0.65 output per million tokens (median across 16 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.261 per million tokens for GLM-4.6V-Flash versus $0.275 for Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (1.1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B has not been scored yet and GLM-4.6V-Flash has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B and GLM-4.6V-Flash yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 128,000 for GLM-4.6V-Flash. Maximum output per response: Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B up to 262,144, GLM-4.6V-Flash up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B accepts text; GLM-4.6V-Flash accepts text, images and video. GLM-4.6V-Flash handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B is the newest, released Mar 11, 2026. GLM-4.6V-Flash came out Dec 8, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B Jun 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons